Cross-Connected Roller Drive Hydraulics for Slippage Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ground processing machines face issues with slippage in drive roller segments, leading to inefficiencies and energy loss due to the use of flow dividers in hydraulic drive systems, particularly in electro-hydraulic systems where energy storage is limited.

Innovation Solution

A hydraulic drive system with cross-connected traction drive hydraulic motors and pumps, eliminating the need for flow dividers, ensures efficient energy use by preventing excessive fluid outflow during slippage, and allowing for independent operation of drive roller segments with a structurally simpler design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If flow dividers are used to prevent slippage in drive roller segments, then torque transmission is maintained during slippage, but device complexity increases and energy efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque transmission reliabilityVSAvoidhydraulic drive system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive rollers are divided into multiple independently driven roller segments, each with its own hydraulic motor. This segmentation allows individual segments to be controlled separately, enabling torque redistribution without complex flow dividers by simply isolating the slipping segment's hydraulic supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flow divider component is completely removed from the hydraulic system. Instead of using flow dividers to manage fluid distribution, the system extracts this function by using separate hydraulic circuits for each motor, where slippage is handled by isolating individual motor-fluid connections rather than managing flow distribution centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If flow dividers are used to maintain fluid supply during slippage, then torque transmission is maintained, but energy efficiency decreases due to throttling losses

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetorque transmission reliabilityVSAvoidhydraulic energy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The flow divider component is completely removed from the hydraulic system. Instead of using flow dividers to manage fluid distribution, the system extracts this function by using separate hydraulic circuits for each motor, where slippage is handled by isolating individual motor-fluid connections rather than managing flow distribution centrally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

During slippage, the hydraulic supply to the affected motor is partially restricted by closing its supply valve, rather than throttling flow through a flow divider. This partial action (complete valve closure or opening) eliminates throttling losses while still preventing excessive fluid outflow from the slipping motor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If independent hydraulic motors are used for each drive roller segment, then slippage can be controlled, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveslippage control capabilityVSAvoidhydraulic drive system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drive rollers are divided into multiple independently driven roller segments, each with its own hydraulic motor. This segmentation allows individual segments to be controlled separately, enabling torque redistribution without complex flow dividers by simply isolating the slipping segment's hydraulic supply.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each hydraulic motor has its own supply and return line connections with individual control valves. This self-service design allows each motor to be independently controlled without requiring complex centralized flow management systems, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining slippage control capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If electro-hydraulic drive system is used with limited energy storage, then compact design is achieved, but energy efficiency becomes critical

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem compactnessVSAvoidhydraulic energy loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

During slippage, the hydraulic supply to the affected motor is partially restricted by closing its supply valve, rather than throttling flow through a flow divider. This partial action (complete valve closure or opening) eliminates throttling losses while still preventing excessive fluid outflow from the slipping motor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts the harmful effect of slippage (excessive fluid outflow and energy loss) into a beneficial control mechanism. By monitoring fluid flow from each motor and selectively isolating slipping segments, the system uses the slippage condition itself as a trigger for automated hydraulic circuit adjustment, improving overall energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively prevents slippage and energy loss, maintaining consistent rotational speeds and torque across drive roller segments, enhancing energy efficiency and reducing the need for complex adjustments, especially in electro-hydraulic systems.

Implementation Method 1

a first traction drive hydraulic pump (P1), a second traction drive hydraulic pump (P2), at least one drive motor for driving the first traction drive hydraulic pump (P1) and the second traction drive hydraulic pump (P2) for supplying hydraulic fluid to the traction drive hydraulic motors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic drive: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

a first traction drive hydraulic motor (M1), a second traction drive hydraulic motor (M2), a third traction drive hydraulic motor (M3), a fourth traction drive hydraulic motor (M4)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic motor conversion: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS20250207337A1Ground processing machine
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 HAMM AG
  • US20250207337A1 patent drawing
  • US20250207337A1 patent drawing
  • US20250207337A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a ground processing machine having two drive rollers arranged longitudinally and rotatable about a respective axis of rotation, wherein each drive roller comprises two drive roller segments aligned along the direction of the associated axis of rotation, having a hydraulic drive system for the drive rollers, a first fluid connection of a first traction drive hydraulic pump is connected or connectable by means of a first hydraulic line to a first and second traction drive hydraulic motor, and a first fluid connection of a second traction drive hydraulic pump is connected or connectable by means of a second hydraulic line to a third and fourth traction drive hydraulic motor. A second fluid connection of the first pump is connected or connectable by means of a third hydraulic line to the second and third motors, and a second fluid connection of the second pump is connected or connectable by means of a fourth hydraulic line to the first and fourth motors.