Roller Hemming Force Feedback for Consistent Flange Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The roller hemming process in the automotive industry requires time-consuming and costly optimization to achieve desired hemming quality, mainly due to dependencies on material, flange geometry, and robot-specific uncertainties, necessitating manual adjustments and expertise.

Innovation Solution

A method for automated optimization of the roller hemming process using a control unit to adjust hemming forces and geometry, with self-learning algorithms and optical sensors to detect and correct the hemming path, allowing for precise control of the hemming roller and flange formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If manual optimization of robot path with offset correction is used, then hemming quality can be improved, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehemming qualityVSAvoidoptimization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the actual hemming force is measured during the process and fed back to the control unit. The control unit automatically adjusts the robot path offset based on this feedback to achieve target hemming quality, eliminating the need for manual trial-and-error optimization loops.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-optimization by automatically adjusting its own parameters (robot path offset) based on measured hemming forces. The control unit autonomously corrects the hemming process without requiring manual intervention or expertise, making the system self-sufficient in achieving quality optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If manual optimization with expert intervention is performed, then hemming quality can be optimized, but process complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehemming qualityVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual expert intervention (mechanical/human system) with an automated control system that uses force measurement and algorithmic processing. The control unit automatically translates force measurements into path corrections, substituting human expertise with an automated decision-making system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit acts as an intermediary between the force measurement and the robot path adjustment. It processes the measured hemming forces and automatically generates the necessary offset corrections, serving as a mediator that eliminates the need for direct human intervention while maintaining optimization capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If robot-guided roller hemming is used for flexibility, then adaptability to different components is improved, but force control precision deteriorates due to robot uncertainties

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidforce control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces force feedback measurement that directly monitors the actual hemming forces applied by the robot-guided roller. This feedback enables automatic compensation for robot-specific uncertainties and elasticities, maintaining force control precision despite the flexibility benefits of robot guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the robot path parameters (offset values) based on measured force deviations. By automatically adjusting these parameters in response to actual hemming conditions, the system compensates for robot uncertainties while maintaining the flexibility of robot-guided operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20250091111A1Roller hemming device, roller hemming method and method for setting a hemming process
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 THYSSENKRUPP AUTOMOTIVE BODY SOLUTIONS GMBH
  • US20250091111A1 patent drawing
  • US20250091111A1 patent drawing
  • US20250091111A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for setting a roller hemming process for hemming a plurality of identical component arrangements comprises guiding a hemming roller arranged on a robot by the robot in accordance with a predetermined hemming path for forming a hemming flange of a component of a component arrangement, wherein a hemming process force acting on the hemming roller by the robot during forming is detected, wherein the hemming process force can be changed by a corresponding control of the robot, and a target hemming quality to be achieved is predetermined. The robot is controlled to achieve the target hemming quality, taking into account the detected hemming process force and an actual geometry of a formed hemming flange resulting from the forming process.