Exercise Device Roller Retainer via Inclined Guide Track

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing exercise devices with inclined ramps face challenges in reliably and cost-effectively retaining rollers, which can lead to instability and complexity during use.

Innovation Solution

The exercise device incorporates a frame with stabilizer portions, guide mechanisms, and projection features on rollers that work together with inclined guide tracks to securely retain rollers, providing a stable and compact design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional retaining mechanisms are used for rollers on inclined ramps, then roller retention reliability may improve, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller retention reliabilityVSAvoidretaining mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer member is integrated with the ramp structure to form a unified component, eliminating the need for separate retaining mechanisms. The retainer member includes a retaining surface that directly contacts the roller, combining the ramp support function with the roller retention function in a single structural element.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer member serves multiple functions: it provides a bearing surface for the roller, retains the roller on the inclined ramp, and structures the overall ramp assembly. This multi-functional design reduces the number of separate components needed while maintaining reliable roller retention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Stability of the object's composition

If complex retaining structures are implemented, then roller stability may improve, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer member is designed with distinct functional segments: a bearing surface for roller contact, a retaining surface for securing the roller, and integration points for attachment to the ramp. This segmentation allows for optimized manufacturing of each functional area while maintaining overall stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The retainer member's geometry is optimized with specific angular relationships - the retaining surface is angled relative to the bearing surface to match the ramp inclination. This parameter optimization provides stable roller retention through geometric constraints rather than complex mechanical fastening, reducing manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of manufacture

If simple retaining designs are used, then manufacturing cost may decrease, but roller retention reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidroller retention reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer member is designed to self-retain the roller through its geometric configuration. The bearing surface and retaining surface work together to automatically secure the roller in position on the inclined ramp without requiring additional active retention mechanisms, providing reliable retention through passive geometric constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If additional retaining components are added, then device functionality may improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller retention reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer member integrates multiple retention functions into a single component that works in conjunction with the ramp structure. Rather than adding separate retainers, guides, and fastening mechanisms, the design combines these functions into one unified retainer member with appropriately angled surfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration ensures smooth and stable roller movement along the tracks, reducing the likelihood of rollers separating and enhancing the overall exercise experience while simplifying the device's design and reducing fabrication costs.

Implementation Method 1

rollers reciprocate during exercise on an inclined ramp

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

one or more rollers roll

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling: Roller

Data Source

PatentUS7758472B2Exercise device ramp roller retainer
Publication Date: 2010.07.20 PELOTON INTERACTIVE INC
  • US7758472B2 patent drawing
  • US7758472B2 patent drawing
  • US7758472B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exercise device as a member configured to be driven by one or more feet, a roller rotationally coupled to the first member and a first projection extending away from the first roller. The exercise device includes a roller guide including an inclined floor underlying the roller and overhang extending over the projection opposite a first side of the roller.