Conditioning Roller Shell Axial Groove Depth for Crop Comminution

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing conditioning devices for forage harvesters lack sufficient comminution of crops due to smooth profiles in certain areas of the roller shells, which impede effective processing of materials like corn grains.

Innovation Solution

A roller shell design featuring grooves extending in both the axial and circumferential directions, with deeper axial grooves ensuring material retention and comminution, and crenellated profiles formed by adjacent grooves, allowing for improved crop processing by creating projecting edges and immersed profile blocks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If smooth profiles are used in roller shell grooves, then manufacturing is easier, but crop comminution effectiveness deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroller shell manufacturingVSAvoidcrop comminution effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The roller shell surface is designed with different groove depths in different locations: circumferential grooves have a first depth while axial grooves have a second depth that is greater than the first depth. This local variation in groove depth creates projecting edges at the bottom of the circumferential grooves that engage and comminate crop material, while maintaining manufacturability through a consistent grooving process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Productivity

If deeper axial grooves are introduced, then crop comminution is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrop comminution effectivenessVSAvoidgroove structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The roller shell surface is segmented into two sets of grooves: circumferential grooves extending in the circumferential direction and axial grooves extending in the axial direction. The intersection of these grooves creates a grid pattern with profile blocks and profile bottoms, where the deeper axial grooves create projecting edges that enhance comminution while the segmented structure remains systematically manufacturable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If profile blocks are immersed in grooves of opposing roller, then material processing is enhanced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial processing efficiencyVSAvoidroller interaction mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The roller shells are designed with asymmetric groove depth characteristics: axial grooves are deeper than circumferential grooves. This asymmetry creates projecting edges at the bottom of circumferential grooves that protrude into the opposing roller's grooves, enabling effective material engagement and comminution through the interaction of profile blocks with groove spaces, while maintaining structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Data Source

PatentUS9326448B2Roller shell for a conditioning roller
Publication Date: 2016.05.03 DEERE & CO
  • US9326448B2 patent drawing
  • US9326448B2 patent drawing
  • US9326448B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A roller shell for a conditioning roller has grooves extending in the axial direction and grooves extending in the circumferential direction. The grooves extending in the axial direction are deeper than the grooves extending in the circumferential direction.