Rolling Airbag Ejection Mechanism for Non-Circular Launch Tubes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ejection systems for items from air or surface vehicles require precise piston and cylinder constructions, leading to high costs, drag, leakage, and incompatibility with non-round tube cross-sections, and are challenging for long ejection strokes.

Innovation Solution

An inflatable device with rolling convolutions, such as airbags, is used to eject items, eliminating the need for pistons and seals, allowing for non-circular tubes and accommodating various projections, and can be telescopic for longer strokes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a piston and cylinder construction is used to maintain a hermetic seal, then sealing reliability is improved, but device complexity and manufacturing cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehermetic seal reliabilityVSAvoidpiston and cylinder construction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the piston and cylinder components entirely from the ejection system, replacing them with a simplified inflatable bladder mechanism. This extraction of unnecessary components directly reduces device complexity while maintaining the hermetic seal function through the inflatable bladder design, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a disposable inflatable bladder that is replaced after each use, eliminating the need for complex, expensive, and durable piston-cylinder assemblies. This approach reduces manufacturing costs and device complexity while maintaining reliable sealing during each ejection cycle, addressing the contradiction through cost-effective single-use components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If a piston and cylinder construction is used to maintain a hermetic seal, then sealing reliability is improved, but drag increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehermetic seal reliabilityVSAvoiddrag force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

By removing the piston-cylinder interface that generates significant drag, the patent eliminates this harmful factor. The inflatable bladder design creates minimal friction during expansion and ejection, maintaining seal reliability while dramatically reducing drag forces that impede ejection efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Force

If a piston and cylinder construction is used, then ejection force is improved, but compatibility with non-round tube cross-sections is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection forceVSAvoidcompatibility with non-round tube cross-sections
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs a dynamic inflatable bladder that can adapt its shape to match various tube cross-sections including non-round configurations. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to maintain effective contact and generate sufficient ejection force across different geometries, resolving the contradiction between force generation and geometric compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The inflatable bladder design serves multiple functions: it provides ejection force, maintains hermetic seal, and adapts to various tube cross-sections including non-round shapes. This multi-functionality makes the system universally compatible with different tube geometries while maintaining effective ejection force, addressing the contradiction between force and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If traditional piston and cylinder construction is used, then ejection reliability is improved, but manufacturing cost and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveejection reliabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent adopts disposable inflatable bladders that are inexpensive to manufacture and replace. These simple components eliminate the need for precision-machined piston-cylinder assemblies, dramatically reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining reliable ejection function through each use cycle.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

By extracting the complex piston-cylinder components and replacing them with simple inflatable bladders, the patent significantly simplifies the manufacturing process. The removed components were the primary source of manufacturing difficulty, and their elimination enables easier, faster, and more cost-effective production while preserving ejection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces costs, eliminates drag and leakage, and enables ejection of items with projections through non-circular tubes, providing a scalable, reliable, and efficient ejection mechanism.

Implementation Method 1

gas enters the inflatable device to facilitate expansion of the inflatable object

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

the inflatable object rolls against the tube inner surface as it expands to move and/or eject the item from the tube

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling: Roller

Data Source

PatentUS12540043B2Ejection of items using an inflatable device with rolling convolutions
Publication Date: 2026.02.03 EAGLE TECHNOLOGY LLC
  • US12540043B2 patent drawing
  • US12540043B2 patent drawing
  • US12540043B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, an ejection mechanism includes an inflatable device with an inflatable object (e.g., a silicone impregnated or other airbag, etc.) that is folded back inwardly on itself into an interior space of the inflatable object (e.g., forming a convolution, etc.) to envelop an item for ejection from a tube. In order to eject the item, gas enters the inflatable device to facilitate expansion of the inflatable object. The tube structure withstands the pressure loading as does the convolution of the inflatable object. Due to the tube limiting the expansion, the inflatable object rolls against the tube inner surface as it expands to move and/or eject the item from the tube. The inflatable device may further include an inflatable object (e.g., one or more airbags, etc.) in a telescopic arrangement with inflatable telescopic or nested stages (or convolutions) to eject or release the item.