Rolling Block Restraint Connector Linkage Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current connectors for structural framing members, such as rolling block restraint (RBR) connectors, face issues with eccentric loading causing twisting forces, complex installation due to multiple threaded rods, and potential weakening of members when using pins through centroids, leading to misalignment and reliability concerns.

Innovation Solution

The use of fixed-length links with adjustable wedge shims and spacers to set the angle of member intersection, along with extended block shafts to maintain parallel orientation and alignment, and transverse clamping fasteners to resist lateral forces, forming a moment-resistant connection that is independent of member size and material.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple threaded rods are used for linkage, then the connection can be adjusted, but the installation becomes complex and difficult to properly adjust

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadjustabilityVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The linkage assembly is divided into separate components: a linkage body with pre-drilled holes and separate threaded rods. This segmentation allows for simplified assembly where workers only need to insert and secure the threaded rods through the predefined holes, rather than dealing with complex multi-rod adjustments simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The linkage body acts as an intermediary component that pre-positions and aligns multiple threaded rods. By providing a central structure with predetermined hole locations, it mediates the alignment process and simplifies the adjustment procedure for connecting shafts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Strength

If a pin through the centroid is used to fix members, then vertical support is provided, but members are weakened and it is difficult to erect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevertical supportVSAvoidease of erection
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The linkage system extracts the vertical support function from a single centroidal pin and distributes it across multiple connection points through the linkage body. This removes the need for a large centroidal hole while maintaining vertical support capability through distributed load paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The solution moves from a single-point (centroidal pin) to a distributed multi-point connection system. By adding dimensional distribution across multiple holes and linkage connection points, the system provides vertical support without requiring a large central opening that would weaken the member.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If shafts are offset from each other, then the connection can accommodate member geometry, but twisting forces occur and misalignment happens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometric compatibilityVSAvoidalignment stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The linkage body is designed with asymmetric hole patterns that can accommodate offset shaft positions. The holes are strategically positioned to match the specific geometric requirements of the connected members, allowing asymmetric shaft arrangements while maintaining proper load paths and alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The linkage body is pre-configured with holes positioned to anticipate and compensate for shaft offsets. By performing the alignment calculation and hole positioning in advance during manufacturing, the system eliminates field alignment issues and prevents twisting forces that would occur with improper offset accommodation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11078661B2Rolling block restraint connector having an improved linkage assembly
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 CANBY TIMOTHY WILLIAM
  • US11078661B2 patent drawing
  • US11078661B2 patent drawing
  • US11078661B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rolling block restraint connector for forming a moment resisting connection at a joint intersection between a continuous first structural member and at least a first continuous second structural member that intersects the continuous first structural member is shown. The connector includes a first restraint assembly including (i) a first block, (ii) a second block, and (iii) a first shaft that passes through channels of the first block and the second block, a second restraint assembly including (i) a third block, (ii) a fourth block, and (iii) a second shaft that passes through channels of the third block and the fourth block, a first linkage that couples the first restraint assembly with the second restraint assembly, and a second linkage that couples the first restraint assembly with the second restraint assembly, wherein the first shaft and the second shaft each pass through the first linkage and the second linkage.