One-Handed Rolling Cane with Multi-Point Base

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of assistive walking devices that provide intermediate support, as single point canes offer insufficient support while two-handed walkers are unwieldy and burdensome for those who do not require substantial assistance, leading to decreased muscle strength, poor posture, and balance issues.

Innovation Solution

A one-handed rolling cane with four points of contact, designed to increase the base of support and balance, featuring a centrally placed handgrip for stability and control, and an efficiently accessible storage compartment, allowing for more fluid motion and reduced energy expenditure.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a single point cane is used, then the device is simple and easy to operate, but it provides insufficient support and balance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidsupport and balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The base of the cane is segmented into multiple contact points (three or four gliders/wheels) instead of a single point, creating a multi-point support system that increases stability while maintaining the simplicity of a cane structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support system transitions from a single vertical point to a distributed planar arrangement of multiple contact points, adding spatial dimensionality to the base of support and significantly improving balance capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If a two handed walker is used, then substantial support and balance is provided, but the device becomes unwieldy and burdensome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport and balanceVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device extracts only the essential support function from a full walker by using a single handgrip and lightweight frame, removing unnecessary bulk and complexity while retaining the beneficial multi-point contact base for stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The cane incorporates rolling elements (wheels) and gliding surfaces that enable dynamic, fluid motion compared to static walker feet, allowing easier propulsion and maneuverability with one hand

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a two handed walker is used when not needed, then substantial support is provided, but it leads to decreased large muscle strength, poor posture, and loss in balance and maneuverability

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesupportVSAvoidmuscle strength and maneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The device provides localized support exactly where needed (through the handgrip and base of support) without the excessive support of a full walker, allowing users to maintain natural posture and muscle engagement while receiving appropriate assistance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12011414B2Rolling cane
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 ROCK RHONDA
  • US12011414B2 patent drawing
  • US12011414B2 patent drawing
  • US12011414B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A one handed walk assist device featuring a handle and plurality of legs affixed to a variably shaped support frame, featuring various independent embodiments including an embodiment trapezoidal orientation between the front and back legs, and an embodiment apparatus orientation that is angled backwardly. A variety of storage/carriage compartments are disclosed.