Rolling Joint Component for Snake-Like Surgical Motion Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing snake-like surgical robots face challenges in simultaneously achieving strength, flexibility, and accuracy due to issues with rolling joints, such as asynchronous and sideways slippage, dislocation, and complex control algorithms.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a series of joint components with first and second rolling surfaces and spur gears to form synchronous bi-stable rolling joints, reducing friction and slippage, and allowing controlled motion, while also featuring a hollow interior for cable and instrument passage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If rolling joints are used in snake-like surgical robots, then flexibility and navigation capability are improved, but slippage and asynchronous motion occur resulting in uncontrolled movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility and navigation capabilityVSAvoidmotion control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A spur gear is introduced as an intermediary element between the two rolling surfaces. The gear teeth engage with corresponding teeth on adjacent joint components, providing a positive mechanical constraint that prevents slippage and asynchronous motion while allowing the rolling surfaces to maintain their flexible, curved geometry for smooth navigation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The rolling surfaces are designed as curved surfaces that roll against each other, replacing traditional rigid pivot joints. This curvature allows the joint to follow natural anatomical pathways and provides smooth, continuous motion while the spur gear ensures synchronized rotation of adjacent segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

2Ease of operation

If rolling surfaces are used without additional constraints, then friction is reduced and motion is smooth, but sideways slippage occurs causing joint dislocation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion smoothnessVSAvoidjoint alignment stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The spur gear acts as a mediating constraint between the rolling surfaces. Its teeth engage with corresponding gear teeth on adjacent components, providing a positive mechanical stop that prevents sideways displacement and maintains joint alignment while allowing the rolling surfaces to continue their smooth rolling motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The joint component combines two different mechanical mechanisms: rolling contact for smooth motion and gear engagement for constraint. This composite approach integrates the advantages of both friction-based rolling and tooth-based positive drive, achieving both smooth operation and stable alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Device complexity

If traditional pivot point joints are used, then control algorithms are simpler, but force transmission capability and friction performance are inferior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol algorithm complexityVSAvoidforce transmission capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The spur gear serves as an intermediary that bridges the gap between simple pivot joints and complex rolling mechanisms. By engaging gear teeth, it provides a well-defined mechanical relationship between adjacent joints that is easier to model than pure rolling contact, while still delivering superior force transmission and friction performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances force transmission capabilities, reduces the risk of joint dislocation and asynchronous movement, and simplifies control algorithms, enabling smooth and controlled motion within the human anatomy.

Implementation Method 1

A rolling joint is a mechanical structure where two curved surfaces roll against each other. A rolling joint offers advantages such as limited friction, since the surfaces roll against each other, leading to large force transmission capabilities.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRolling friction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

When adjacent joint components come together to form a joint, the two spur gears will engage with one another in a normal manner, thus limiting movement between adjacent joint components.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear engagement: Gear

Data Source

PatentEP3742954B1Joint component
Publication Date: 2024.03.06 IP2IPO INNOVATIONS LTD
  • EP3742954B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~2C
  • EP3742954B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3742954B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3C

AI summary

A surgical instrument having a proximal end, a distal end and a shaft, the shaft comprising a plurality of joint components connected in series, each joint component comprising first and second connectors, which connectors are axially spaced apart from one another at first and second ends of a respective joint component, characterised in that the first connector comprises a first rolling surface, and the second connector comprise a second rolling surface, and wherein each joint component comprises a first spur gear extending from the first rolling surface, and a second spur gear extending from the second rolling surface, wherein the first rolling surface of a first joint component is engageable with the second rolling surface of a second joint component to form a rolling joint, and the second rolling surface of the first joint component is engageable with a first rolling surface of a third rolling joint.