Rolling Element Retainer Structure for Rigid, Lubricated Linear Guides

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rolling element retainers for limited-stroke linear guides lack sufficient rigidity and effective lubrication, leading to reduced load capacity and increased vibration during relative movement of the rails.

Innovation Solution

A rolling element retainer with a polygonal body featuring accommodating holes and apertures that store lubricating grease or porous lubricants, along with protruding portions that span adjacent accommodating holes, enhancing rigidity and load capacity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If the retainer is made thinner and less rigid to reduce material usage, then manufacturing cost decreases, but load capacity and structural strength deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidload capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer body is divided into multiple protruding portions that extend between adjacent accommodating holes. These protruding portions act as structural ribs that segment the body into multiple zones, providing localized reinforcement without requiring the entire retainer to be thick-walled. This segmentation allows thin-walled construction while maintaining overall structural strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protruding portions are strategically positioned at critical locations between accommodating holes where stress concentration occurs. By concentrating material only where structurally necessary rather than uniformly throughout the retainer, the design achieves high local rigidity at stress points while maintaining thin overall wall thickness for cost efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Strength

If the number of openings in the retainer is reduced to maintain cage strength, then structural rigidity improves, but the number of rolling elements that can be accommodated decreases, reducing load capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecage strengthVSAvoidnumber of rolling elements
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer body is segmented into multiple protruding portions that create rigid structural zones. These segments provide strength without requiring reduced numbers of openings, as each protruding portion acts as an independent structural element that reinforces the areas between accommodating holes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of increasing wall thickness in the radial dimension to strengthen the retainer, the design adds protruding portions that extend in the axial dimension. This dimensional transition allows the retainer to accommodate more rolling elements through additional openings while gaining structural strength from the axially-extending protruding portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Device complexity

If lubrication is not provided for the rolling elements, then device complexity decreases, but friction increases causing vibration and reduced smoothness of movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructure complexityVSAvoidvibration
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer structure provides self-lubrication through protruding portions that extend between accommodating holes. These protruding portions create channels or reservoirs that retain lubricating grease, which then automatically lubricates the rolling elements as they move through the accommodating holes. The structure serves its own lubrication needs without external lubrication systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The protruding portions are designed with porous characteristics or create porous-like structures between accommodating holes. These porous regions retain lubricating grease through capillary action, allowing the lubricant to be held in place and gradually released to lubricate the rolling elements during motion, reducing friction and vibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #31Porous materials

4Ease of manufacture

If protruding portions do not span all adjacent accommodating holes, then manufacturing simplicity increases, but tensile strength against axial tensile force decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidtensile strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The retainer is designed with multiple protruding portions that each span specific sets of adjacent accommodating holes. This segmentation creates multiple discrete reinforcement zones along the retainer length, providing cumulative tensile strength against axial forces while maintaining manufacturing simplicity through standardized repeating units.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The protruding portions are pre-formed as integral parts of the retainer body during manufacturing, rather than being added as separate components. This preliminary formation of reinforcement structures during the primary manufacturing process maintains ease of manufacture while ensuring continuous material flow and optimal tensile strength distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides improved rigidity and tensile strength, increased load capacity, and reduced vibration by ensuring smooth rolling of the elements through effective lubrication.

Implementation Method 1

apertures located between the accommodating holes and communicating with the accommodating holes for storing lubricating grease or porous lubricants to provide lubrication for the rolling elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLubrication: Lubrication

Data Source

PatentUS20250198456A1Rolling element retainer, slide member and limited-stroke linear guide
Publication Date: 2025.06.19 CHIEFTECH PRECISION
  • US20250198456A1 patent drawing
  • US20250198456A1 patent drawing
  • US20250198456A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A rolling element retainer, a slide member and a limited-stroke linear guide are disclosed. Rolling elements are placed in the rolling element retainer to form the slide member. The slide member is disposed between two fixed-length rails to form the limited-stroke linear guide. The rolling element retainer includes a body, a plurality of accommodating holes distributed on the body for accommodating rolling element, and a plurality of apertures formed on the body and located between the accommodating holes. Lubricants are stored in the apertures, which can provide lubrication when the rolling elements roll. The body has a polygonal profile and at least four protruding portions protruding away from the body. The protruding portions extend continuously across all the adjacent accommodating holes. In this way, the rolling element retainer has better rigidity and more accommodating holes to accommodate more rolling elements, thereby improving the load capacity of the limited-stroke linear guide.