Rolling Tarp Enclosure Rear Locking and Tensioning Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rolling tarp enclosure systems for flatbed trailers face limitations in tensioning mechanisms, particularly at the rear end, which can lead to uneven tension, reduced durability of wheels, and increased complexity in installation and operation, while also requiring additional components for drop deck trailers, increasing costs and interfering with system movements.

Innovation Solution

The system introduces improved rear locking and tensioning mechanisms that allow for easier and safer adjustment, enhanced durability, and simplified construction, including a movable rail system for drop deck trailers that eliminates the need for extra rail sections and carriages, along with lightweight and cost-effective modifications to support bows and wheeled carriages, and additional load securing mechanisms that minimize cargo space reduction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional tensioning mechanisms are used at the rear end, then the tarp can be tensioned, but the tension is uneven and the wheels suffer reduced durability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarp tension uniformityVSAvoidwheel durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the dynamics principle by making the rear rail movable rather than fixed. The rear rail can move horizontally along the rear support structure, allowing the tensioning mechanism to dynamically adjust the tarp tension distribution. This movement capability enables the system to achieve uniform tension across the tarp while preventing excessive concentrated forces on the wheels, thereby improving both tension uniformity and wheel durability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If additional rail sections and carriages are added for drop deck trailers, then the system can accommodate different deck levels, but the complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrop deck compatibilityVSAvoidrail system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the universality principle by designing a single, multi-functional rail system that can accommodate both standard flatbed trailers and drop deck trailers. The rear rail assembly is designed to be adjustable and adaptable to different deck configurations without requiring separate rail sections or additional carriages. This universal design reduces system complexity while maintaining versatility across different trailer types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If conventional locking mechanisms are used, then the tarp can be secured, but the adjustment process is complex and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarp securing reliabilityVSAvoidadjustment simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the mechanics substitution principle by replacing complex manual mechanical locking mechanisms with a simpler system. The rear rail incorporates a streamlined locking mechanism that can be easily engaged and disengaged, reducing the number of steps and components involved in the adjustment and securing process. This substitution maintains reliable tarp securing while significantly improving ease of operation and reducing adjustment time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10946733B2Rolling tarp enclosure system
Publication Date: 2021.03.16 DEMONTE WALTER PETER
  • US10946733B2 patent drawing
  • US10946733B2 patent drawing
  • US10946733B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A movable, tarp enclosure system includes a movable carriage having a main body and plural primary support wheels connected to the main body, at least one of the wheels being disposed at a first vertical level and at least one of the wheels being disposed at a being vertical level. The system also includes a support rail having a first and second support walls, the upper surfaces of which are respectively engaged by the carriage wheel(s) disposed at the first vertical level and at the second vertical level for movably supporting the movable carriage on the support rail.