Rolling View Virtualization for Mail Processing Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mail distribution systems face inefficiencies and logistical challenges in processing large quantities of mail due to strict cycle-based processing, leading to increased setup and shutdown times and errors, especially when handling small mail cycles.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that optimize mail processing by determining whether all or a portion of electronic mail data from a cycle can be processed for mailing, allowing for the combination of multiple cycles to increase job size and reduce the number of processing jobs, thereby enhancing efficiency and reducing inefficiencies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If strict cycle-based mail processing is used, then mail distribution coordination is maintained, but processing efficiency decreases and setup/shutdown time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemail distribution coordinationVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically determines whether to process mail in strict cycle-based batches or to combine multiple cycles into a single job based on real-time evaluation of job size thresholds. This dynamic approach allows the system to adapt between two processing modes: traditional cycle-based processing for small volumes and consolidated multi-cycle processing for larger volumes, thereby optimizing both coordination reliability and processing efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the processing parameter from fixed cycle-based batches to variable job-based batches by evaluating whether the cumulative mail volume from multiple cycles meets a predetermined threshold. This parameter change enables the system to consolidate cycles when beneficial, reducing the frequency of setup and shutdown operations while maintaining coordination through electronic data tracking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If multiple cycles are combined into one job, then setup and shutdown time is reduced, but processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup and shutdown timeVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary evaluation before processing by checking whether the cumulative mail volume from multiple cycles meets the predetermined threshold. This preliminary action determines whether cycles should be combined or processed separately, allowing the system to prepare appropriate processing configurations in advance and avoid unnecessary complexity during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from electronic mail data to continuously monitor cumulative job sizes and make real-time decisions about cycle combination. The feedback mechanism evaluates whether combining additional cycles would meet the threshold benefit, allowing intelligent adjustment of processing strategy without requiring complex manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If small mail cycles are processed individually, then processing accuracy is maintained, but the number of processing jobs increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing accuracyVSAvoidnumber of processing jobs
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple small mail cycles into a single processing job when their cumulative volume meets the predetermined threshold. This merging maintains processing accuracy through electronic data validation while reducing the total number of separate jobs, thereby eliminating redundant setup and shutdown operations and improving overall productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8874676B2Rolling view virtualization
Publication Date: 2014.10.28 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US8874676B2 patent drawing
  • US8874676B2 patent drawing
  • US8874676B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Rolling view optimization is initiated by receiving electronic mail data corresponding to a plurality of mail pieces, the electronic mail data including a first cycle and determining whether substantially all electronic mail data from the first cycle can be processed for mailing. In response to determining that substantially all of the electronic mail data from the first cycle cannot be processed for mailing, a determination is made whether a portion of the mail data from the first cycle can be processed for mailing and in response to determining that a portion of the mail data from the first cycle can be processed for mailing the electronic mail data corresponding to the first cycle for mailing is sent.