Roof Paver Locking System for Uplift Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rooftop paver systems face instability and uplift forces due to extreme weather conditions and human traffic, particularly in high-rise buildings, where ballasted pavers may dislodge or crack, posing safety hazards and aesthetic issues.

Innovation Solution

A paver locking system comprising a geometrically shaped upper frame with cross-braces and a center connector, attached to a stationary object, which fits into grooves on the pavers to provide counterbalancing forces and channel debris and water, enhancing stability and aesthetic appeal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If ballasted pavers are used to create rooftop decks, then the pavers can be easily installed and removed, but the pavers become unstable under extreme weather conditions and high uplift forces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of installation and removalVSAvoidstability of pavers under wind uplift
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system divides the paver assembly into modular components: individual pavers remain separate units that can be independently installed and removed, while the locking mechanism segments the uplift force distribution across multiple attachment points, maintaining both ease of operation and enhanced stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The locking system acts as an intermediary mechanism between the pavers and the rooftop structure. It provides a controlled connection that allows easy installation and removal while simultaneously resisting uplift forces through anchored connections, mediating between the conflicting requirements of ease of operation and stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Stability of the object's composition

If heavier pavers are used to resist uplift forces, then stability improves, but the difficulty of installation and handling increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to uplift forcesVSAvoidease of installation by workers
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system provides a counterbalancing mechanism that compensates for the lack of weight in lightweight pavers. The anchored locks create opposing forces that counteract uplift pressures, allowing lightweight pavers to achieve the same stability as heavy ballasted pavers without the handling difficulties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the passive mechanical approach of using heavy weight for stability with an active mechanical locking system. Instead of relying on gravity and mass to resist uplift, the system uses engaged locks and anchors that actively secure pavers, making lightweight materials as stable as heavy ones while improving ease of installation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If pavers are loose-laid for easy access to roof surface, then accessibility improves, but the pavers dislodge during extreme weather events

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility to roof surfaceVSAvoidreliability under hurricane force winds
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system provides a dynamic solution that adapts to different operational states: during normal conditions, pavers remain accessible and can be removed as needed; during extreme weather, the locked engagement provides reliable anchorage. The system transitions between accessibility mode and stability mode based on environmental conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Shape

If pedestal height is increased to accommodate roof contour variations, then surface uniformity improves, but the leverage effect increases uplift forces on pavers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniformity of rooftop surfaceVSAvoiduplift force on pavers
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The locking system is installed in advance to preemptively counteract the increased uplift forces caused by pedestal height. By establishing secured engagement before extreme weather events occur, the system prevents paver dislodgement despite the leverage effect created by elevated pedestals

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP3234279B1Roof paver locking system and method of deploying thereof
Publication Date: 2022.10.19 ESSIG DANIEL
  • EP3234279B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3234279B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3234279B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An apparatus and methods for locking together pavers on a roof deck to reduce uplift pressure and increase stability and strength in a variety of environmental conditions. More specifically, a paver lock apparatus is placed in grooves on the top side of a multiple of pavers and locked to a stationary object, such as the roof or a pedestal placed on the roof underneath the deck. Roof pavers are manufactured with grooves on the paver surface to hold the paver lock apparatus. The pavers are loose laid on paver pedestals and the paver lock apparatus is laid into the grooves of multiple adjacent pavers and locked into place by connecting the paver lock apparatus to the paver pedestal.