Roofing Panel Retaining Clip with Segmented Hook Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing retaining clips for roofing panels pose risks of injury during handling due to pointed projections and cause damage to the panels over time due to wind-induced movement, leading to inadequate holding and potential material grooving.

Innovation Solution

A retaining clip with a second leg featuring a hook area angled more than 90°, forming a long contact edge with slots dividing it into multiple hook elements, which adapt to the panel's underside, eliminating sharp points and ensuring secure attachment without damaging the panel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pointed projections are used on the second leg to prevent removal of the retaining clip, then the holding security is improved, but the risk of injury to the assembler and damage to the roofing panel increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveholding securityVSAvoidinjury risk and panel damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The second leg is divided into multiple hook elements (at least two) spaced apart along its length, transforming a single pointed projection into multiple distributed contact points. This segmentation maintains holding security through distributed engagement while eliminating concentrated sharp points that cause injury and damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using pointed projections extending outward from the second leg, the invention inverts the approach by creating hook elements that bend toward the web, forming a hook area angled more than 90°. This inversion transforms harmful sharp points into safe, rounded contact surfaces that engage the roofing panel underside without causing injury or damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Reliability

If pointed projections are used to secure the retaining clip, then the initial attachment is improved, but long-term reliability deteriorates due to material grooving and bending

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinitial attachmentVSAvoidlong-term holding durability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The second leg is divided into multiple hook elements (at least two) spaced apart along its length, transforming a single pointed projection into multiple distributed contact points. This segmentation maintains holding security through distributed engagement while eliminating concentrated sharp points that cause injury and damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using pointed projections extending outward from the second leg, the invention inverts the approach by creating hook elements that bend toward the web, forming a hook area angled more than 90°. This inversion transforms harmful sharp points into safe, rounded contact surfaces that engage the roofing panel underside without causing injury or damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Device complexity

If a single continuous second leg is used, then the structural simplicity is maintained, but the adaptability to panel irregularities is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidadaptation to panel irregularities
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The second leg is divided into multiple hook elements (at least two) spaced apart along its length, transforming a single pointed projection into multiple distributed contact points. This segmentation maintains holding security through distributed engagement while eliminating concentrated sharp points that cause injury and damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The hook elements are formed with a hook area angled more than 90° relative to the second leg, allowing them to flex and adapt to irregularities in the roofing panel underside. This dynamic configuration enables the retaining clip to accommodate panel variations while maintaining secure engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2239392B1Holding clamp for a roof decking panel
Publication Date: 2014.06.04 FRIEDRICH OSSENBERG SCHULE & SOHNE GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2239392B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP2239392B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6
  • EP2239392B1 patent drawingFigure 7

AI summary

The clamp (1) has a bracket (4) with a hook region, which is aligned with two ends towards a connecting rod. The hook region forms an elongate installation edge for installation at a lower side of a roof cover plate, where the edge corresponds to breadth of the bracket. The hook region is subdivided into hook elements (10-12) by a slot (9), which is opened towards free hook ends and is aligned parallel to margin edges of the bracket. The slot runs over entire length of the hook region and over a length of the bracket up to the rod. The clamp is made of a sheet metal strip.