Rooftop Hydronic Heating Unit to Reduce Ignition Risk and Testing Cost

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rooftop air conditioning systems face challenges in efficiently heating air without posing an ignition risk, requiring extensive testing for different configurations, which is costly and limits flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A rooftop air conditioning unit with a hydronic heating system that uses a heating element and heat exchanger, decoupling fuel combustion from airflow, and employing a fluid supply circuit to heat air, allowing for flexible fan and ductwork configurations without additional testing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If tubular heat exchangers with direct combustion are used, then high air temperatures can be achieved, but ignition safety risks and extensive testing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair temperatureVSAvoidignition safety
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a heat exchanger as an intermediary component that decouples the combustion process from the air heating process. The heat exchanger transfers thermal energy from combustion gases to the air stream without allowing direct contact between the flame and the air, thereby achieving high air temperatures while eliminating ignition safety risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The heating system is segmented into distinct functional zones: a combustion chamber for fuel burning, a heat exchanger for heat transfer, and a air heating section. This segmentation allows the combustion process to occur in isolation from the air stream, enabling temperature control and safety improvement simultaneously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If extensive testing is conducted for different unit configurations, then ignition safety can be ensured, but cost and time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition safetyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs preliminary design actions by implementing a standardized heat exchanger configuration that inherently prevents ignition risks. This preliminary safety design eliminates the need for repeated testing of different configurations, as the heat exchanger architecture itself guarantees safety across various unit setups

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses a standardized, proven heat exchanger design that can be copied and applied across different unit configurations. This standardization allows the same safe design pattern to be replicated without requiring re-testing, reducing both time and cost while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If alternative unit configurations are used, then system flexibility improves, but testing must be repeated or the configuration cannot be used

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveunit configuration flexibilityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The heat exchanger design is made universal and multi-functional, capable of being integrated into various unit configurations without modification. This universal design allows different fan types, duct arrangements, and housing styles to be used while maintaining the same safe heating performance, enabling system flexibility without additional testing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides efficient heating of air while minimizing the risk of ignition and allowing for various system configurations without the need for repeated testing, reducing costs and enhancing system flexibility.

Implementation Method 1

the heating element is a gas fired boiler... supplied with fuel... The combustion of the fuel generates heat

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 2

The electrically resistive element may include an electric boiler... another similar heating device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 3

a heat exchanger disposed within the housing and along the pathway to heat the air traveling along the pathway

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS9683748B2Rooftop hydronic heating unit
Publication Date: 2017.06.20 CARRIER CORP
  • US9683748B2 patent drawing
  • US9683748B2 patent drawing
  • US9683748B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rooftop air conditioning unit to provide conditioned air to a conditioned space within a building is provided and includes a housing, disposed on a roof of the building roof, defining a pathway from an inlet fed by exterior and/or interior air to an outlet leading to the conditioned space and a hydronic heating system disposed within the housing to heat the air traveling along the pathway.