Root Insert Stopper Insertion With Guided Piston Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for inserting stoppers in metal root inserts of composite wind turbine blades are prone to user error, leading to mechanical failures and increased assembly time, and are not visually assessable, posing safety risks and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a chassis with a bottom plate, pillar, struts, top cover, absorber clamp, and piston, equipped with sensors and a limit switch, is used to accurately and repeatably insert stoppers into metal root inserts, ensuring proper positioning and alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual insertion method is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision and reliability deteriorate due to user error and positioning errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion system complexityVSAvoidstopper positioning precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical insertion system with an automated piston-driven mechanical system. The piston mechanically pushes the stopper into the root insert with controlled force and precision, eliminating human error while maintaining mechanical simplicity through standardized components like the piston, clamp, and alignment features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates self-alignment features where the piston and clamp automatically position themselves relative to the root insert during insertion. The alignment bearing and cylindrical bearing enable self-positioning without requiring precise manual alignment, allowing the system to service itself during the insertion process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If manual insertion method is used, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity deteriorates due to increased assembly time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion system complexityVSAvoidassembly speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary alignment and positioning actions through the alignment bearing and cylindrical bearing before the actual stopper insertion. The piston is pre-positioned and the clamp is pre-aligned with the root insert, enabling rapid insertion without requiring time-consuming manual adjustment during the insertion process itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The automated piston system enables continuous insertion action without interruption. Once the system is activated, the piston continuously pushes the stopper into the root insert in a single uninterrupted motion, eliminating the start-stop nature of manual insertion and improving assembly speed through continuous useful action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Device complexity

If manual insertion method is used, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to mechanical damage and safety risks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsertion system complexityVSAvoidassembly safety and integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The alignment bearing and cylindrical bearing act as intermediary elements between the insertion system and the root insert. These intermediaries protect the root insert from direct impact and mechanical damage by providing controlled, gradual insertion while absorbing misalignment stresses, thereby improving reliability without requiring complex protective systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If automated insertion system is implemented, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestopper positioning precisionVSAvoidinsertion system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated insertion system is segmented into distinct functional modules: the alignment bearing for positioning, the clamp for securing, the piston for pushing, and the limit switch for control. This segmentation allows each component to be simple and standardized while collectively achieving high precision, reducing overall system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250229497A1Root insert stopper fastening equipment
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 TPI TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US20250229497A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229497A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229497A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for inserting a stopper in a metal root insert, the system comprising a chassis, the chassis having a bottom plate, a pillar extending perpendicularly therefrom to a second end, at least one strut having a first end and a top cover disposed at the second end of the at least one strut, the top cover disposed perpendicularly to the bottom plate, an absorber clamp extending perpendicular to the pillar, the absorber clamp having a circular bearing configured to hingedly close, a top clamp disposed at the second end of the pillar, and having a cylindrical bearing configured to vertically translate relative to the top clamp, a piston disposed below the top cover and configured to translate vertically through at least one of the bottom plate and the top cover and a limit switch operatively coupled to piston, the limit switch configured to detect a travel of the piston.