Root of Trust Entity for Secure Boot Authentication

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current memory devices face security vulnerabilities during the boot sequence due to multiple authentication processes, making them susceptible to tampering, and the use of multiple public keys for signature verification can be cumbersome and insecure.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a Root of Trust (ROT) entity that authenticates code prior to initialization, using a single public key for signature verification and generating hash measurements to ensure code integrity, with configurable authentication methods and secure storage of measurement results.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple authentication processes are used during boot sequence, then code verification capability is improved, but device complexity and vulnerability to tampering increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode verification capabilityVSAvoidauthentication process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple authentication processes into a single centralized Root of Trust (ROT) entity that performs all code verification operations. This consolidation reduces the complexity of managing multiple authentication processes while maintaining comprehensive code verification capability through a unified security architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the authentication function by separating the Root of Trust (ROT) entity from the code being verified. The ROT entity acts as an independent intermediary that receives code, performs authentication using stored public keys, and returns verification results. This segmentation allows the authentication logic to be isolated and simplified.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple public keys are used for signature verification, then authentication coverage is improved, but key management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication coverageVSAvoidkey management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a public key storage component as an intermediary between the ROT entity and the code verification process. This storage component centrally manages multiple public keys associated with different code sources or entities, allowing the ROT to access and verify signatures using appropriate keys without managing the key infrastructure directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The Root of Trust entity serves as a universal authentication service that can verify signatures from multiple different public keys stored in the key storage component. This multi-functional design allows a single verification mechanism to handle authentication for various code sources, improving coverage while centralizing key management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If code authentication is performed prior to initialization, then security against tampering is improved, but boot sequence time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity against tamperingVSAvoidboot sequence time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs code authentication as a preliminary action before code initialization, ensuring that only verified code is executed. The Root of Trust entity verifies code signatures and checks measurement results against stored values before the code is loaded and initialized, preventing tampered code from entering the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the ROT entity receives code, performs authentication, and returns verification results to control the initialization process. Based on the authentication feedback, the system decides whether to proceed with code initialization or block execution, enabling security verification without unnecessary delays in the boot sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11797680B2Device with chain of trust
Publication Date: 2023.10.24 MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US11797680B2 patent drawing
  • US11797680B2 patent drawing
  • US11797680B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and devices to enable a device with chain of trust are described. A controller may authenticate a root of trust entity as part of a boot-up procedure of a system that includes the root of trust entity. The root of trust entity may receive, as part of the boot-up procedure, a first portion of code associated with a first entity of the system. The controller may generate a first measurement result of the first portion of code and may identify, by the root of trust entity, a second measurement result associated with the first portion of code. The controller may determine, by the root of trust entity, whether the first measurement result matches the second measurement result as part of authenticating the first portion of code and may transmit, by the root of trust entity, an indication of whether the first and second measurement results match.