Automated Rootkit Detection via Memory Dump Header Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack effective automation for detecting and mitigating operating system rootkits, which can hide within the kernel and evade detection, leading to system crashes and security vulnerabilities.

Innovation Solution

A rootkit detection system comprising an operating system memory with a malicious software identification and extraction module, utilizing machine-readable instructions to analyze memory dumps, compress data, scan for header files, and identify and extract malicious software by comparing against stored headers, thereby automating the detection and mitigation process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual detection methods are used to identify rootkits, then detection accuracy can be maintained, but the complexity of operation and time required increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis by automatically analyzing memory dumps, comparing driver signatures against known rootkit patterns, and generating detection results without requiring manual forensic analysis. The automated rootkit detector service continuously monitors system memory and independently identifies malicious software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual forensic analysis processes are replaced with automated computational algorithms that scan memory dumps, compare driver signatures, and identify rootkits using pattern recognition and hash matching techniques, eliminating the need for manual inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive memory analysis is performed to detect rootkits, then detection capability improves, but system resource consumption and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously monitoring and analyzing system memory in real-time, maintaining cached information about loaded drivers and their signatures. When a crash occurs, the pre-analyzed memory data and driver information are immediately available for rapid rootkit detection without requiring full post-mortem analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial analysis by focusing specifically on critical memory regions containing driver signatures and executable code, rather than analyzing entire memory dumps. This selective approach maintains high detection capability while reducing processing overhead and resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If automated detection systems are implemented, then operational efficiency improves, but the complexity of the detection system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated rootkit detector service performs multiple functions including memory dump analysis, driver signature comparison, rootkit pattern recognition, and crash log examination within a single integrated system. This multi-functional approach improves operational efficiency while avoiding the need for multiple separate detection tools.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary database that stores known rootkit signatures, driver information, and crash log patterns. This intermediary structure simplifies the detection process by providing pre-organized reference data that the automated analyzer can efficiently query, reducing the complexity of direct comparison operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If memory dumps are stored and analyzed for rootkit detection, then detection accuracy improves, but storage requirements and data management complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoiddata storage volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and stores only critical portions of memory dumps, specifically driver signatures, executable code headers, and suspicious memory regions, rather than archiving complete memory images. This extraction approach maintains detection accuracy by preserving essential forensic data while significantly reducing storage requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw memory dump data into compressed formats and extracts key parameters such as driver signatures and hash values for storage. By changing the representation parameters from full memory images to condensed signature data, the system reduces storage volume while maintaining the ability to accurately detect rootkits through signature matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11593482B2Systems and methods for automating detection and mitigation of an operating system rootkit
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 SAUDI ARABIAN OIL CO
  • US11593482B2 patent drawing
  • US11593482B2 patent drawing
  • US11593482B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods to detect malicious software include an application software repository including a stored header file associated with a driver, an executable, or both, and are operable to (i) receive a memory dump file upon an operating system crash including a driver copy, an executable copy, or both, (ii) verify the memory dump file is new for analysis, (iii) compress the verified memory dump file to generate a memory snapshot of the verified memory dump file, (iv) scan the memory snapshot for a memory dump header file associated with the driver copy, the executable copy, or both, and (v) identify and extract malicious software when the memory dump header file from the memory snapshot fails to match at least one stored header file in the application software repository.