Ropeless Elevator Car Propulsion via Segmented Stators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Self-propelled elevator systems face challenges due to the use of multiple motors and guide rails, which increase weight, space requirements, and costs, particularly in high-rise buildings where multiple elevator cars share a single hoistway.

Innovation Solution

The elevator system employs a design with a hoistway divided into two portions, where each car is propelled by a single mover interacting with a stationary stator, eliminating the need for additional guide rails in one portion and utilizing a guidance system in the other, allowing for horizontal shifting or rotation between hoistway portions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple motors are disposed on different sides of the elevator car, then the car can be propelled in multiple hoistway portions, but the weight of the car increases and additional space is required in the hoistway

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to operate in multiple hoistway portionsVSAvoidweight of elevator car
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The hoistway is divided into multiple portions (first hoistway portion and second hoistway portion) with stationary stators disposed in each portion. The single mover on the car interacts with different stators in different portions, allowing the car to be propelled throughout the entire hoistway without requiring multiple motors on the car itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from a horizontal arrangement (multiple motors on opposite sides of the car) to a vertical arrangement (single mover interacting with stationary stators at different vertical positions in different hoistway portions). This dimensional change allows the car to access multiple hoistway portions while maintaining a single motor configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple guide rails and supports are used, then the car can be guided in multiple hoistway portions, but the footprint of the hoistway increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to operate in multiple hoistway portionsVSAvoidfootprint of hoistway
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The hoistway is segmented into multiple portions, each equipped with its own stationary stator and guiderail. This segmentation allows each portion to be independently configured with minimal guidance infrastructure, reducing the overall footprint compared to a continuous multi-directional guide rail system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses vertical stacking of hoistway portions rather than horizontal expansion. Each portion has its own guiderail disposed vertically, allowing the car to transition between portions without requiring lateral space for additional guide rails, thus minimizing the horizontal footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple motors and guide rails are used, then the system can handle multiple hoistway portions, but the system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to operate in multiple hoistway portionsVSAvoidsystem cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the propulsion function into a single mover unit that can interact with different stationary stators in different hoistway portions. This consolidation eliminates the need for multiple motors and their associated control systems, reducing manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining the ability to serve multiple portions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single mover is designed with universal functionality to interact with stationary stators in any hoistway portion. This multi-functional design eliminates the need for portion-specific motor configurations, reducing overall system cost through standardization and simplification of components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces weight, space requirements, and costs by minimizing the number of motors and guide rails, enhancing the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the elevator system while maintaining reliable propulsion and safety.

Implementation Method 1

The first car is propelled in the first hoistway portion by only the interaction of the first mover with the first stationary stator, and the first car is propelled in the second hoistway portion by only the interaction of the first mover with the second stationary stator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic propulsion: Electromagnetic Propulsion

Data Source

PatentUS10246298B2Ropeless elevator system
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 OTIS ELEVATOR CO
  • US10246298B2 patent drawing
  • US10246298B2 patent drawing
  • US10246298B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An elevator system (10) is disclosed. The elevator system (10) may comprise a hoistway (18) including first and second hoistway portions (12, 16), a first car (14), a first stationary stator (44a) disposed in the first hoistway portion (12) and a second stationary stator (44b) disposed in the second hoistway portion (16), a first mover (42) mounted on the first car (14), and a first guiderail (62) disposed in the first hoistway (12). The first hoistway portion (12) may be free of other guiderails (62) for the first car (14). The first car (14) may be propelled in the first hoistway portion (12) by only the interaction of the first mover (42) with the first stationary stator (44a). The first car (14) may be propelled in the second hoistway portion (16) by only the interaction of the first mover (42) with the second stationary stator (44b).