Rotary Drive Frequency Control Using Autocorrelation Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling rotary drives in track construction machines lack precise and rapid frequency change detection, leading to delayed frequency changes and suboptimal phase stabilization.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming a series of time-discrete measured values and using autocorrelation and cross-correlation functions to determine frequency and phase shifts in real-time, with iterative calculations and signal filtering to enhance accuracy and reduce computational effort, allowing for precise synchronization of rotary drives.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional zero-crossing detection methods are used to determine frequency, then the measurement system is simple, but the frequency change detection is delayed and imprecise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency detection precisionVSAvoidfrequency change detection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional zero-crossing detection methods with autocorrelation-based frequency analysis. Instead of mechanically detecting zero-crossing points in the signal, the system uses mathematical autocorrelation functions to determine frequency, enabling precise and rapid detection of frequency changes without the delays inherent in zero-crossing methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary signal processing by forming time-discrete measured value series and calculating autocorrelation functions in advance. This allows the system to have frequency detection results ready before actual frequency changes occur, reducing detection time and enabling proactive frequency control adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If autocorrelation and cross-correlation calculations are performed in real-time with high accuracy, then frequency and phase detection precision is improved, but computational effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency and phase detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational power requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the correlation function calculation into manageable time-discrete measured value series. By processing signals in discrete time steps and using iterative calculation methods, the system breaks down the complex autocorrelation and cross-correlation computations into smaller, more efficient operations that reduce overall computational power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial correlation calculations by using a predetermined number of measured values for correlation computations. Instead of calculating correlations over the entire signal history, the system uses a limited window of recent measured values, which provides sufficient accuracy for frequency and phase detection while significantly reducing computational effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If the cycle time for forming measured value series is reduced to improve detection accuracy, then frequency detection precision is improved, but the computational frequency requirement increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational processing rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses a predetermined, limited number of measured values for each correlation calculation rather than processing entire signal sequences. This partial action approach maintains high detection accuracy with shorter cycle times while keeping the computational load per cycle manageable, allowing the system to achieve high processing rates without sacrificing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic calculation of autocorrelation and cross-correlation functions at defined cycle intervals. This periodic action allows the system to maintain accurate frequency detection by regularly updating measurements while managing computational resources efficiently through structured, periodic processing rather than continuous high-frequency calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3973255B1Method and apparatus for controlling/regulating a rotary drive of a work unit of a track laying machine
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 PLASSER & THEURER EXPORT VON BAHNBAUMASCHINEN GMBH
  • EP3973255B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3973255B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP3973255B1 patent drawingFigure 7~8

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for controlling/regulating a rotary drive (13) of a work unit (4) of a track laying machine (1), in which a measurement variable (X) with an approximately periodic history function derived from a rotation of the drive (13) is detected by means of a sensor (19), a frequency (f) or period duration (T) of the history function being determined by means of an evaluation unit (21) and the frequency (f) or period duration (T) being compared with a target variable for predetermining an actuation signal. In this case a series of time-discrete measurement values (xi) is formed for the measurement variable (X), an autocorrelation of these measurement values (xi) for determining the frequency (f) or period duration (T) being carried out by means of a computer unit (22). Thus, in contrast to a conventional method with zero crossing detection, an accurate detection of frequency changes is also possible between two zero crossings.