Rotary Drum Sheet Handling with Meandering Air Flow Passage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High productivity printing systems with large drums face complexity and high air resistance issues, requiring powerful vacuum systems and increased operational costs due to friction and air leakage between the drum and shutter member.

Innovation Solution

A sheet handling apparatus with a rotary drum and stationary shutter member featuring a meandering air flow passage with protrusions and recesses, reducing air leakage and friction, and eliminating the need for a radial manifold, thus lowering air resistance and operational costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Duration of action of moving object

If a large diameter drum is used to increase dwell time for heat exchange, then the dwelling time of sheets on the drum surface is sufficiently long for drying or cooling, but the device complexity and air resistance increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedwell timeVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drum surface is segmented into multiple chambers distributed over the periphery, with each chamber having its own suction connection. This segmentation allows for localized control of suction in different angular positions, enabling efficient sheet handling without requiring an excessively large drum diameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The suction force is made dynamically controllable through the shutter member that can selectively block suction openings in different chambers at different angular positions. This dynamic control allows optimization of suction timing and location, improving sheet handling efficiency without increasing drum size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If a segmented drum with radial manifold is used, then sheets can be handled in high productivity systems, but the air resistance between suction system and vacuum holes is relatively high

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidair resistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The radial manifold is completely removed from the design. Instead, each chamber is independently connected to the suction system through its own suction opening in the drum flange. This eliminates the long radial air passages through the manifold, dramatically reducing air resistance and the power required to drive the vacuum system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The suction connections are moved from a radial configuration (through the drum wall and manifold) to an axial configuration (through the drum flange). This dimensional change creates much shorter and more direct air passages from the vacuum holes to the suction system, reducing air resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Force

If a powerful vacuum pump is used to overcome high air resistance, then sufficient suction force is achieved at vacuum holes, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuction forceVSAvoidoperational costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The design optimizes the pneumatic circuit by eliminating the radial manifold and directly connecting each chamber to the suction system through the drum flange. This creates efficient air flow paths with minimal resistance, allowing the use of a smaller, more energy-efficient vacuum pump while maintaining sufficient suction force for high productivity operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

4Use of energy by moving object

If friction between drum and shutter member is reduced, then power consumption decreases, but air leakage between drum and shutter member increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidair leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The mechanical contact between the drum and shutter member is replaced with a magnetic coupling system. The shutter member is magnetically attracted to the drum surface without physical contact, eliminating friction while preventing air leakage through the magnetic field. This substitution resolves the contradiction between reducing friction and preventing air leakage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution reduces air resistance, allowing for stronger sheet holding and minimizing sheet deformation, increasing productivity and print quality while lowering power consumption and maintenance costs.

Implementation Method 1

a suction system for controlling a flow of air through the perforations of the drum, thereby to attract sheets to the peripheral wall of the drum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Suction

Implementation Method 2

The narrow passage comprises a large air resistance greatly reducing the amount of air leaking into the drum

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAir resistance: Drag

Implementation Method 3

As the sheets come into intimate contact with the peripheral wall of the drum, the heat conductivity of that wall may be utilized for controlling the temperature of the sheets, i.e. for heating or cooling them

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat conductivity: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS10053323B2Sheet handling apparatus with rotary drum
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 OCE HLDG BV
  • US10053323B2 patent drawing
  • US10053323B2 patent drawing
  • US10053323B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A sheet handling apparatus for a printing system includes a rotary drum having an inner chamber circumferentially surrounded by an outer peripheral wall with perforations formed therein. By means of sucking an air flow through the perforations of the drum to a suction system, sheets are attracted to the peripheral wall of the drum. A stationary shutter member is positioned inside the inner chamber for blocking the flow of air through the perforations when they pass, with the rotation of the drum, through a first predetermined angular range. The shutter member includes protrusions while the rotary drum includes recesses for receiving the protrusions, such that a meandering air flow passage is formed between the shutter member and the rotary drum. As such, friction between the rotary drum and the stationary shutter member is reduced, thereby reducing the power consumption of the suction system.