Rotary Beverage Filler Detection and Ejection Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing beverage container filling systems face issues with collisions and damage due to large rotating masses and moments of inertia, leading to slow operation and potential system shutdowns when handling errors occur, as they require long stopping distances and low rotational speeds to prevent damage.

Innovation Solution

A system with a detection device that identifies non-transferred containers using mechanical, optical, or acoustic means, coupled with an ejection device to prevent collisions by removing stuck containers and allowing the system to continue operating or stop safely, ensuring precise transfer points and efficient filling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the rotational speed of the filler carousel is increased to improve filling performance, then productivity increases, but the stopping distance increases due to high moments of inertia, leading to longer downtime when shutdowns are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefilling performanceVSAvoidstopping distance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The detection device detects non-transferred containers before they cause collisions, and the ejection device ejects them in advance. This preliminary action prevents the need for emergency shutdowns, allowing the system to maintain high rotational speeds for improved productivity while minimizing actual stopping time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The detection device continuously monitors the transfer points and provides feedback about non-transferred containers. This feedback enables the control system to activate the ejection device at the appropriate moment, ensuring smooth operation without interruptions that would increase downtime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the rotational speed is reduced to allow for shorter stopping distances, then system reliability improves by preventing collisions, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoidfilling performance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The ejection device acts as an intermediary mechanism between the detection device and the filler carousel. When a non-transferred container is detected, the ejection device removes it before it can cause a collision, allowing the system to maintain high rotational speeds without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the traditional mechanical approach of reducing rotational speed for safety with a detection-and-ejection system. This substitution allows the system to maintain high speeds while ensuring safety through active monitoring and intervention, thereby preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a non-transferred container is not detected and removed, then the system structure remains simple, but collisions occur causing damage to system components and requiring shutdowns

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidcollision damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The detection device and ejection device work together to identify and remove non-transferred containers before they can cause collisions. This preliminary action prevents damage to system components and eliminates the need for shutdowns, significantly improving reliability with only moderate increases in device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the detection and ejection systems are added to prevent collisions, then reliability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrouble-free operationVSAvoidsystem components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection device provides continuous feedback about the status of containers at transfer points. This feedback enables the control system to activate the ejection device only when necessary, achieving high reliability with minimal additional complexity. The system adds intelligence rather than substantial mechanical complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP2100845B1Method and facility for filling drink containers
Publication Date: 2013.12.18 KRONES AG
  • EP2100845B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2100845B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2100845B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The plant has stationary anchored and permanently rotating transport and filling system with a defined number of positions for individual beverage containers. A definite transfer point (22) is provided for holding and filling the beverage containers during revolution of the transport and filling system. A detection device (36) is also provided for identifying a beverage container that is not delivered from the rotating transport and filling system to the transfer point (26). An independent claim is included for a method for filling beverage containers.