Rotary Force Limiter with Flexural Yield Plates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Commercial and industrial storage rack systems are vulnerable to damage and goods displacement during earthquakes due to uncontrolled racking motion, which existing diagonal ties attempt to mitigate but may lead to catastrophic failure under high peak loads.

Innovation Solution

A control structure with a rocker frame assembly and rotary units that utilize flexural members to absorb seismic forces by flexing elastically or plastically, maintaining a constant resistive yield force and limiting peak accelerations and displacements, while preventing membrane forces from developing within the system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If diagonal ties are used to reduce lengthwise racking, then rack rigidity is improved, but peak loads increase causing catastrophic failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverack rigidityVSAvoidpeak load capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the mechanical parameters of the diagonal ties by introducing rotary joints that allow controlled rotation. This transforms the ties from rigid elements to flexible elements that can rotate to accommodate seismic movements, thereby reducing peak loads while maintaining rack stability during earthquakes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic behavior to the diagonal ties through rotary joints that enable rotation during seismic events. This dynamic capability allows the ties to adapt to changing load directions and magnitudes, converting static rigid structures into dynamic systems that can dissipate energy through controlled rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Stability of the object's composition

If diagonal ties are tensioned to brace against racking, then lateral stability is improved, but energy absorption capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelateral stabilityVSAvoidenergy absorption capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent converts the harmful effect of seismic energy into beneficial work by allowing the diagonal ties to rotate and absorb energy through controlled motion. The rotary joints enable the ties to transform seismic energy into rotational kinetic energy and heat, dissipating energy that would otherwise cause catastrophic failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the mechanical state of the diagonal ties from purely tensile to tensile-with-rotation, enabling them to perform work during seismic events. This parameter change allows the ties to absorb energy through rotational motion while maintaining lateral stability during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Stability of the object's composition

If rigid diagonal ties are used to prevent racking, then structural rigidity is improved, but ductility and energy dissipation are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural rigidityVSAvoidductility under seismic loading
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic rotation capability to the diagonal ties, transforming them from rigid static elements to dynamic elements that can rotate during seismic events. This enables the structure to maintain rigidity during normal conditions while achieving ductility and energy dissipation during earthquakes through controlled rotational motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite mechanical system combining rigid diagonal ties with flexible rotary joints. This composite approach allows the structure to exhibit both rigidity (from the ties) and ductility (from the rotating joints), achieving both structural stability and seismic energy dissipation simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The control structure effectively limits forces and dissipates energy within storage racks and buildings during seismic events, reducing the risk of catastrophic failure and maintaining structural integrity by allowing controlled flexure and energy absorption.

Implementation Method 1

flexing elastically or plastically

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

flexing elastically or plastically

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasticity: Plasticity

Implementation Method 3

absorb seismic forces by flexing elastically or plastically, maintaining a constant resistive yield force and limiting peak accelerations and displacements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectEnergy dissipation: Damping

Data Source

PatentUS11828083B2Control structure with rotary force limiter and energy dissipater
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 ALLEN JOHN DAMIAN
  • US11828083B2 patent drawing
  • US11828083B2 patent drawing
  • US11828083B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control structure comprising a pivotably based rocker frame assembly integral with rotary yield units able to produce a constant resistive yield force through high elasto-plastic displacements and high ductilities. Located within and distributed about the rotary yield units are flexural yield plates with particular boundary conditions enabling them to elasto-plastically flex to high cycling elasto-plastic displacements and high displacement and curvature ductilities, while maintaining a constant resistive yield force. The constant resistive yield force produced by the replaceable rotary units enables the control structure to resist and endure extreme seismic events (base motion input) with a constant resistive yield force, while plastic curvatures within the yield zones of the flexural plates of the rotary units are maintained well within their capacity; and forces within the control structure, within its supporting foundations, and within masses or other structures it is seismically supportive of are controlled and limited.