Rotary Grater Layout for Larger Piece Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing graters require materials to be cut into small pieces to fit, making it cumbersome to process larger items like hard cheeses, which increases effort and difficulty.

Innovation Solution

The driver is positioned outside the axis of rotation, allowing more than 90% of the interior space to be used for the material, with a design that includes a driver as a flattening of the interior shape and a pressure stamp for efficient comminution, enabling larger pieces to be processed without the need for additional components at the axis of rotation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the driver is arranged in the center of the receptacle to prevent material rotation, then the material can be securely held, but the available interior space for accommodating large pieces is significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial holding stabilityVSAvoidavailable interior space
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The driver is extracted from the central axis position and relocated to the peripheral region of the receptacle. This extraction removes the obstruction from the center, allowing large pieces of material to be accommodated in the previously blocked central area while the driver remains positioned at the periphery to continue preventing material rotation during processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The driver configuration transitions from a centralized axial arrangement to a peripheral distribution arrangement. By moving the driver elements from the central dimension to the peripheral dimension of the receptacle, the design achieves both rotational control and maximum interior space utilization simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If the driver is positioned centrally to ensure proper material engagement, then comminution effectiveness is maintained, but the receptacle cannot accommodate large pieces of material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomminution effectivenessVSAvoidmaterial loading convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The driver is extracted from the central engagement position and relocated to the periphery. This allows large pieces of material to be easily loaded into the central area without obstruction, while the peripheral driver position maintains effective engagement through the rotational movement mechanism during the comminution process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of having the driver in the center engaging material radially outward, the design inverts the arrangement by placing the driver at the periphery engaging material radially inward. This inversion maintains comminution effectiveness while dramatically improving material loading convenience for large pieces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Device complexity

If a central driver design is used to control material rotation, then the grater structure is simplified, but the external dimensions increase to accommodate the central driver and material pieces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegrater structure simplicityVSAvoidexternal dimensions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The central driver component is extracted and relocated to the periphery, allowing the receptacle to be optimized for compact external dimensions. The peripheral driver position eliminates the need for extended central clearance, enabling a more compact overall grater structure while maintaining full functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design allows for effective processing of larger pieces with minimal external dimensions, providing a good comminution result and easy cleaning, with adaptability to different materials through interchangeable drivers.

Implementation Method 1

a stamp can be inserted into the receptacle as a pressing stamp with a precise fit for the transmission of rotary forces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a cutting disc arranged non-rotatably with respect to the housing... the receptacle is rotatably mounted within the housing about an axis of rotation... relative to the housing and thus to the cutting disc

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectShear stress: Shear Stress

Data Source

PatentEP2002771B1Grater
Publication Date: 2011.08.10 LEIFHEIT
  • EP2002771B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2002771B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2002771B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The grater (1) has a retainer (5) for grating the goods, and a cutting disk (3), where the retainer and cutting disk are rotatably stored relative to each other around a rotary axis (6), which runs through an inner space (7) of the retainer. An attachment (8) in the inner space of retainer and outside the rotary axis is rotationally fixed to the retainer. The attachment is dimensioned such that the attachment stretches over a common longitudinal extension of the retainer. A punching tool (9) is insertable into the inner space of the retainer.