Rotary Head Nozzle Imaging Control for Mounting Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic component mounting devices face inefficiencies in imaging processes due to non-adjacent nozzle positions and potential interference, particularly when suction nozzles are not aligned with pre-imaging or post-imaging positions.

Innovation Solution

An electronic component mounting device with a rotary head featuring multiple nozzle holders on a circumference, a lifting and lowering mechanism, and an imaging section that images suction nozzles at pre-imaging and post-imaging positions, with a control system that adjusts imaging processes based on job data to optimize nozzle positioning and reduce control steps.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the suction nozzle is imaged at pre-imaging and post-imaging positions, then imaging accuracy is improved, but the number of control steps increases and efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging accuracyVSAvoidimaging efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple imaging operations into a single control step by utilizing the rotary head's natural rotation to position different nozzle holders at pre-imaging and post-imaging positions simultaneously. This merging of operations maintains imaging accuracy while reducing the total number of control steps required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary positioning of nozzle holders to pre-imaging positions during the rotary head's normal rotation sequence, so that when imaging is required, the nozzles are already in the correct positions. This eliminates the need for additional positioning steps and maintains efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If the suction nozzle is positioned at pre-imaging position for imaging, then imaging is performed, but additional positioning steps are required when the next nozzle is not adjacent, reducing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging capabilityVSAvoidpositioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes the dynamic rotation of the rotary head to automatically bring different nozzle holders to pre-imaging and post-imaging positions in sequence. This dynamic positioning eliminates static repositioning steps and allows continuous, efficient imaging operations without additional time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If multiple nozzle holders are disposed on the rotary head, then mounting capacity is improved, but coordinating imaging across multiple nozzles increases control complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemounting capacityVSAvoidcontrol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal control approach where the same control logic and imaging section serve all nozzle holders on the rotary head. The imaging section can image any nozzle holder at pre-imaging or post-imaging positions using standardized control steps, reducing overall control complexity despite increased mounting capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3813503B1Electronic component mounting device and control method
Publication Date: 2023.09.20 FUJI CORP
  • EP3813503B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3813503B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3813503B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An object is to provide an electronic component mounting device and a control method capable of efficiently performing imaging. In an inspection optimization process, due to a pre-imaging process or a post-imaging process being executed and a control step in which a lifting and lowering process is executed in the same control step, since a number of control steps is reduced as compared to providing a control step for only the pre-imaging process or the post-imaging process, it is possible to efficiently execute the process.