Rotary Impactor Damping for Low-Reaction Orthopedic Reaming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surgical robots face challenges in orthopedic surgery due to high reactionary forces from tools like rotary reamers, leading to navigational errors, damage, and loss of registration, which hinder their effectiveness and safety.

Innovation Solution

A rotary and linear impacting tool with a dampening mechanism and torque sensing system that reduces reactionary forces by spreading them over time and using energy storage means to minimize torque and linear push requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional rotary reamers are used in orthopedic surgery, then bone preparation can be achieved, but high reactionary torque is generated causing robot loss of registration and potential damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobot registration stabilityVSAvoidreactionary torque
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The rotary reamer incorporates an impacting mechanism that delivers periodic impact forces during rotation. This periodic action allows the reamer to break through hard bone sections with impact loads rather than continuous torque, significantly reducing the peak reactionary torque transmitted to the robot while maintaining effective bone preparation capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The reamer system transitions from static continuous rotation to dynamic impacting motion. The impacting mechanism creates variable rotational speed and intermittent contact with the bone, allowing energy to be delivered in controlled impulses rather than continuous force, thereby reducing sustained reactionary torque on the robot

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If conventional rotary reamers are used, then bone cavity preparation is achieved, but surgeon fatigue increases due to high linear force requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgeon fatigueVSAvoidlinear push force
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The impacting mechanism delivers periodic impact forces during reaming, allowing the surgeon to apply significantly reduced linear push force. The impact energy is generated internally by the mechanism rather than requiring continuous high force from the surgeon, dramatically reducing surgeon fatigue while maintaining effective bone preparation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The impacting mechanism is self-powered through the rotational motion itself. The reamer's rotation drives the impacting mechanism to generate the necessary impact forces without requiring additional linear push force from the surgeon, making the system self-sufficient and reducing the physical burden on the operator

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If high energy rotary reaming is performed, then effective bone preparation is achieved, but robot machinery and components may be damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebone preparation efficiencyVSAvoiddamage to robot components
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The impacting mechanism delivers high energy in periodic impulses rather than continuous force. This allows effective bone preparation through high-impact forces while the intervals between impacts allow the robot structure to recover and dissipate stresses, preventing cumulative damage to robot components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates damping elements and flexible couplings that absorb and dissipate impact forces before they reach the robot's precision machinery. This cushioning protects sensitive robot components from the high forces generated during impacting while maintaining the effectiveness of bone preparation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The tool significantly reduces surgeon fatigue and robotic wear by minimizing reactionary forces, improving surgical accuracy and robot stability, allowing for safer and more efficient large bone surgeries.

Implementation Method 1

a wave spring positioned within the housing and operably coupled to the hammer such that rotation of the hammer by the motor causes compression of the wave spring and release of the wave spring causes the cam and impact rod to advance to impart a linear impact on the anvil

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

A rotary and linear impacting tool for orthopedic surgery which minimizes reactionary forces during operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Data Source

PatentEP4284593B1Rotary impactor for orthopedic surgery
Publication Date: 2026.03.04 FIDELIS PARTNERS LLC
  • EP4284593B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4284593B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4284593B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A rotary impactor for orthopedic surgery includes an output anvil and a hammer that is capable of imparting linear and rotary force on the anvil. The anvil may be moveable on a leadscrew element to alternately generate energy in an energy storage means and to move along the leadscrew element to impact the anvil. A viscoelastic mechanism or a dampening mechanism is used to reduce the reflected force and or torque during operation of the rotary impactor. High frequency linear impacts by the impactor obviate the need for a surgeon to provide an external push force on the impactor in order to perform a successful surgical operation.