Rotary Lock Cylinder Spring Actuation Energy Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Electro-mechanical rotary locking cylinders face high energy consumption issues, leading to frequent battery replacement and potential jamming problems due to increased energy expenditure when using existing designs.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a trigger element that moves with the key, a movable slide with an inclined surface for low-friction locking element movement, and spring elements for efficient actuation and automatic return, reducing energy consumption and enhancing operational reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an electric motor with eccentric is used to move the locking element, then the locking element can be actuated, but the energy consumption becomes comparatively high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking element actuationVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from a static locking mechanism to a dynamic one where the locking element can move between locked and unlocked positions. The spring element provides dynamic force to move the locking element out of the rotor recesses, eliminating the need for continuous motor power during locking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The spring element serves as a self-powered mechanism that automatically moves the locking element when the rotor is turned. The system uses the rotational motion of the rotor itself to compress the spring, which then provides the force to eject the locking element without requiring additional motor energy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If high energy is expended to move the locking element, then the locking element can be actuated, but battery replacement frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking element actuationVSAvoidbattery replacement frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The spring element creates a dynamic system where mechanical energy is stored and released cyclically. The spring is compressed during rotor rotation and then releases stored energy to move the locking element, creating an energy-efficient cycle that reduces battery consumption and replacement frequency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The locking mechanism operates through periodic cycles: the rotor turns to compress the spring, then the spring releases to move the locking element, and the cycle repeats. This periodic action allows the system to reuse mechanical energy from each rotation rather than requiring continuous electrical power.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If the locking element is moved with increased energy expenditure, then the locking element can be actuated, but jamming between cams and housing may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocking element actuationVSAvoidjamming
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the cam-based mechanical system with a spring-based system. Instead of using cams that engage and disengage the locking element through complex mechanical motion, the spring provides a simpler, more reliable force that pushes the locking element out of the rotor recesses without the risk of jamming between cams and housing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution significantly reduces energy consumption, extends battery life, and prevents jamming by allowing the locking element to be moved with minimal energy expenditure, ensuring functional reliability and extended battery life.

Implementation Method 1

a spring element (43), which is arranged in the guide element (28) and on which the locking element (25) can rest in the locked position, thereby the locking element (25) can be moved into the unlocked position by compressing the spring element (43) in the direction of its longitudinal axis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the movable part has a surface which is inclined to the direction of movement of the locking element and on which the locking element rests in the locked position. This inclined surface makes it possible to move the slide away from the locking element with very little friction.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP1966455B1Electromechanical rotary lock cylinder
Publication Date: 2018.03.14 ASSA ABLOY (SCHWEIZ) AG
  • EP1966455B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP1966455B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP1966455B1 patent drawingFigure 5a~7d

AI summary

Disclosed is a rotary lock cylinder comprising a blocking element (25, 64) that engages into the rotor (10) in a closed position while releasing the rotor (10) in an open position. An actuator (17, 78) can be controlled in accordance with data located on the key (2). In order to displace the blocking element (25, 64) from the closed position into the open position, a latch element (33, 63) is provided which can be moved along with the key (2). The blocking element (25, 64) can be attached by means of the actuator (17). The energy required for moving the blocking element (25) is supplied by the user when introducing the key (2) into the key duct (11) such that the load on the power source used for actuating the actuator (17, 78) is minimal.