Rotary Machine Casing Segmentation and Flange Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing turbine casing designs face challenges in reducing size, preventing fluid leakage, and ensuring structural rigidity and maintenance accessibility, particularly in large turbines, due to increased size and complexity which affects performance and safety.

Innovation Solution

The casing is divided in the axial direction, with coupling flanges projecting minimally, and a central third flange supporting the blade ring, reducing overhang and enhancing thermal distribution, while a conical connection member enhances strength and prevents fluid leakage by acting as an end plate within the pressure vessel.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If the casing is divided into two on the horizontal surface with joining flanges on the entire periphery, then the rigidity of the entire apparatus is secured, but the casing itself is increased in size and the mass of the entire turbine is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverigidity of the entire apparatusVSAvoidmass of the entire turbine
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The casing is divided into an upper casing and a lower casing along a horizontal division surface, allowing the structure to be assembled from segments while maintaining overall rigidity through strategic flange placement at critical locations rather than around the entire periphery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Joining flanges are provided only at specific locations (inlet end and/or outlet end) rather than on the entire periphery, concentrating structural reinforcement where needed while reducing overall casing size and weight

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Stability of the object's composition

If the casing is divided into two on the horizontal surface, then the rigidity is secured, but the range from which the working fluid leaks is increased due to the extended joining surface

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproverigidityVSAvoidworking fluid leakage
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The casing is segmented into upper and lower portions with joining flanges located at specific ends rather than continuously around the periphery, reducing the total length of joining surfaces where leaks could occur

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A sealing structure is provided at the joining surface between the upper and lower casings, acting as an intermediary element that prevents working fluid leakage across the division surface

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-generated harmful factors

If the casing is hermetically closed as in the pot-like structure, then the leakage range is reduced, but such structure can be employed only to a relatively small turbine and must be replaced with flange structure in large turbines which increases the axial length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworking fluid leakageVSAvoidaxial length of the casing
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The casing is divided into upper and lower casings with joining flanges positioned at the inlet and/or outlet ends, allowing the structure to accommodate larger turbine sizes while minimizing axial length extension compared to traditional horizontal flange configurations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The division surface is oriented horizontally rather than axially, changing the dimensional orientation of the joint to reduce axial length projection while maintaining sealing effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Device complexity

If the blade ring is supported in a cantilever manner at the end opening, then the structure is simplified, but the overhang is made longer and the center is not sufficiently held with increased thermal extension influence

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidcenter holding precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The blade ring support structure is segmented with the blade ring positioned between the upper and lower casings, allowing for better center alignment and reduced thermal extension influence compared to cantilever support at a single end

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The blade ring is positioned at a location where thermal extension effects are balanced between the upper and lower casings, creating a more stable thermal environment that maintains center precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Data Source

PatentEP2276912B1Rotary machine
Publication Date: 2017.10.25 MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD
  • EP2276912B1 patent drawing
  • EP2276912B1 patent drawing
  • EP2276912B1 patent drawing

AI summary

To reduce the size of a rotary machine and to provide a rotary machine in which it is possible to achieve an improvement in reliability and performance of the rotary machine. A first casing (1) and a second casing (2) formed by dividing a substantially cylindrical casing (101), enclosing in the interior thereof a rotor shaft (4) in which rotor blades (11) are embedded, into two at substantially a central portion relative to an axial direction of the rotor shaft (4) are provided; a first coupling flange (1A) and a second coupling flange (2A) are provided at openings in the first casing (1) and the second casing (2), respectively; a third coupling flange (3A) is provided, which is enclosed by the casing (101), which is positioned at substantially a central portion of the length in the axial direction in a substantially cylindrical blade ring (3) holding stator blades (10) and enclosing the rotor shaft (4), and which holds the blade ring (3); the first casing (1), the second casing (2), and the blade ring (3) being assembled by sandwiching the third coupling flange (3A) between the first coupling flange (1A) and the second coupling flange (2A).