Rotary Machine Control Using Transient Inductance for Saturation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional control systems for rotary machines face accuracy degradation in current estimation due to magnetic saturation, which cannot be sufficiently countered by varying inductance in current feedback or model estimation control.

Innovation Solution

A control system for rotary machines that includes a power conversion circuit, an estimation section, and a determination section, where the estimation section sets provisional switching modes and estimates control amounts using both steady-state and transient-state inductance information to improve accuracy, particularly in high-torque conditions where magnetic saturation occurs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If model estimation control is performed using conventional inductance values, then control is simplified, but current estimation accuracy degrades as current increases due to magnetic saturation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidcurrent estimation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the inductance value variable rather than fixed. The inductance is dynamically adjusted based on the operating condition (current level) to account for magnetic saturation effects. This allows the estimation to remain accurate across different operating ranges while maintaining the simplicity of model estimation control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter (inductance value) based on operating conditions. By using different inductance values for different current ranges (e.g., smaller inductance for higher currents where saturation occurs), the estimation accuracy is maintained without complicating the overall control structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If inductance is varied in current feedback control to counter magnetic saturation, then estimation accuracy improves, but control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent estimation accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamic inductance adjustment but implements it within the model estimation control framework rather than complex feedback control. This maintains accuracy while avoiding the complexity of adaptive feedback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes inductance parameters based on operating conditions but does so in a structured way that simplifies implementation. By pre-defining inductance values for different operating ranges and selecting appropriate values based on current level, the system achieves accuracy without requiring complex real-time parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single inductance value is used for estimation, then control is simple, but accuracy degrades under magnetic saturation conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol structure simplicityVSAvoidestimation accuracy under saturation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the operating range into different regions (e.g., low current vs. high current ranges) and assigns different inductance values to each segment. This segmentation allows accurate estimation across the full operating range while maintaining a simple control structure that only requires selecting the appropriate inductance value based on the current operating point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the inductance parameter based on the operating condition, specifically using a smaller inductance value when magnetic saturation is likely (higher currents) and a larger inductance value when saturation is less likely. This parameter adaptation maintains accuracy without requiring complex control structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8847527B2Control system for a rotary machine
Publication Date: 2014.09.30 DENSO CORP
  • US8847527B2 patent drawing
  • US8847527B2 patent drawing
  • US8847527B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An estimation section calculates estimated currents corresponding to switching modes, which are provisionally set by a mode setting section. A mode determination section determines one of modes, which has a smallest difference between the estimated currents and command currents, to be a final switching mode. A drive section drives an inverter in the switching mode determined by the determination section. The estimation section uses transient-state inductances as coefficients of time differentiation of currents in voltage equations used for estimation of the estimated currents. These are different from steady-state inductances, which are coefficients of multiplication of currents and electric angular velocity.