Rotary Plating Control System for Optimal Parameter Derivation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional rotary surface treating apparatuses require cumbersome and repetitive adjustments of operating parameters to achieve optimal plating quality, which is influenced by various factors such as object shape, size, and solution properties, leading to inefficiencies and increased waste during the plating process.

Innovation Solution

An operating condition determination method that uses a control part with a storage unit to store and adjust liquid and energization parameters through a series of test operations, allowing for the derivation of optimum operating conditions for electroplating, reducing waste and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional rotary surface treating apparatuses are used to carry out plating treatment, then plating can be performed on fine treatment objects, but cumbersome and repetitive adjustments of operating parameters are required to achieve optimal plating quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplating qualityVSAvoidparameter adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control part stores multiple sets of operating parameters (rotation speed, energization current, plating time) that have been pre-optimized for different treatment objects. Before actual plating, the system performs preliminary test operations to automatically determine the optimal parameter set, eliminating the need for manual repetitive adjustments and enabling direct application of proven optimal settings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control part automatically determines optimal operating conditions by analyzing test operation results and selecting appropriate parameter sets from storage. This self-determination capability eliminates manual intervention in parameter adjustment, allowing the system to autonomously optimize plating quality based on the specific characteristics of each treatment object.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If manual adjustment of operating parameters is performed to optimize plating quality, then desired plating treatment can be achieved, but inefficiencies and increased waste occur during the plating process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplating qualityVSAvoidsolution waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary test operations without full energization to evaluate how different liquid parameter settings affect treatment object behavior. Based on feedback from these tests, the control part automatically adjusts and selects optimal parameter sets before actual plating, ensuring minimal solution waste while achieving desired plating quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control part stores and automatically selects from multiple pre-defined parameter sets covering different rotation speeds, energization currents, and plating times. By changing parameters based on treatment object characteristics determined through test operations, the system achieves optimal plating quality without manual trial-and-error that would consume excessive solution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If multiple test operations are performed to determine optimal operating conditions, then efficient derivation of optimal parameters is achieved, but additional time is required for testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter determination efficiencyVSAvoidtest operation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary test operations with partial or reduced energization rather than full plating conditions. This partial action allows rapid evaluation of parameter effectiveness without completing full plating cycles, significantly reducing test time while still providing sufficient data to determine optimal operating conditions for production plating.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the efficient derivation of optimal operating conditions for plating treatment, minimizing waste and improving the quality of plating by automating the adjustment of parameters, thus providing a cost-effective and environmentally friendly solution.

Implementation Method 1

the treatment object is pushed so as to cover a cathode with the treatment object as a result of centrifugal force caused by rotating such container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

electroplating by energizing between an anode provided to a treatment container and a cathode arranged in a direction of periphery of the container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroplating: Electroplating

Data Source

PatentUS8702953B2Method of determining operating condition for rotary surface treating apparatus
Publication Date: 2014.04.22 C UYEMURA & CO LTD
  • US8702953B2 patent drawing
  • US8702953B2 patent drawing
  • US8702953B2 patent drawing

AI summary

It is an object of the present invention to derive the optimum operating condition parameters for plating operation accurately and efficiently. At first, a preliminary test operation is carried out under the energized condition (S12), then in light of such result, a sequential operations such as a first test operation (step S14) in which no energization is carried out for plurality of operating pattern candidates and a second test operation (step S16) under the energized condition are carried out, and then the optimum operating conditions are registered (step S18).