Rotary Reactor Steam Injection for Coke Suppression in Steam Cracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The formation of carbonaceous deposits, particularly coke, in rotary reactors used for steam cracking leads to reduced gas-dynamic efficiency, decreased yield of target olefins, and increased greenhouse gas emissions, necessitating frequent decoking that disrupts production and reduces equipment lifetime.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the targeted supply of additional steam through perforated and/or porous surfaces in high-temperature regions of the reactor, reducing coke formation by adjusting the steam-to-hydrocarbon ratio and maintaining optimal temperature profiles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If steam cracking is performed in a rotary reactor at high temperatures (700-900°C), then the yield of target olefins is improved, but coke formation on reactor surfaces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveyield of target olefinsVSAvoidcoke formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by injecting steam specifically in high-temperature zones (where T≥750-850°C and coke formation is most intense) rather than uniformly throughout the reactor. This targeted approach suppresses coke formation in the most problematic regions while maintaining optimal cracking conditions elsewhere, thus preserving olefin yield.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the steam-to-hydrocarbon ratio in response to detected coke formation rates or temperature conditions. By changing the steam injection parameter in high-temperature zones, the system suppresses coke formation while maintaining efficient cracking reactions in other zones.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If frequent decoking is performed to remove coke deposits, then reactor efficiency is maintained, but production is disrupted and equipment lifetime is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereactor efficiencyVSAvoidproduction disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by proactively suppressing coke formation through targeted steam injection before significant coke deposits accumulate. This preventive approach eliminates the need for frequent decoking operations, thereby maintaining continuous production and extending equipment lifetime.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent ensures continuity of useful action by maintaining steady-state cracking operations without interruption for decoking. The continuous steam injection in high-temperature zones prevents coke accumulation, allowing the reactor to operate continuously at optimal efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Object-generated harmful factors

If additional steam is supplied into high-temperature zones to suppress coke formation, then coke deposits are reduced, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoke depositsVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by supplying steam only in high-temperature zones where coke formation occurs, rather than throughout the entire reactor. This localized approach minimizes the additional energy required for steam generation and injection while effectively suppressing coke deposits only where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by injecting steam only in the specific high-temperature zones where coke formation is problematic, rather than throughout the entire reactor volume. This partial steam injection reduces the energy penalty compared to uniform steam addition while still achieving effective coke suppression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method effectively suppresses coke formation, maintains reactor efficiency, extends the time between decoking procedures, and enhances the yield of desired products while reducing energy consumption and maintenance costs.

Implementation Method 1

supplying an amount of additional steam into a duct region or regions where conditions are established for thermal or thermochemical conversion to occur in the process fluid

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Conduction (thermal)

Implementation Method 2

cracking reactions take place at about 700-900° C. with residence times ranging from a few seconds to a fraction of a second

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal cracking: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS12552998B2Suppression of coke formation in hydrocarbon processing equipment
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 COOLBROOK
  • US12552998B2 patent drawing
  • US12552998B2 patent drawing
  • US12552998B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for reducing coke formation during thermal or thermochemical conversion of hydrocarbon feedstocks in a gaseous diluent using a rotary reactor provided. The method includes supplying an amount of additional gaseous diluent into high-temperature region or regions of the reactor, where conditions are established for thermal or thermochemical conversion to occur. In these regions, the additional gaseous diluent is supplied into a reaction space through perforations and/or pores made in stationary blades or in other surfaces enclosing a process fluid flow. A rotary apparatus configured to implement the method is further provided.