Rotatable Basket Extractor Suction Drainage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rotary extractor systems face a capacity reduction due to prolonged miscella drainage times, which limits the number of baskets available for extraction and results in residual miscella in the spent material.

Innovation Solution

A rotatable basket extractor design incorporating a suction device that generates a downward flow of vapor through the feed material bed, reducing drainage time by creating a pressure differential and accelerating miscella drainage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional gravity drainage is used in rotary extractor, then the structure is simple and easy to operate, but the drainage time is prolonged which reduces extraction capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction capacityVSAvoiddrainage time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies pneumatic principles by introducing a suction device that creates negative pressure to actively draw miscella and vapor from the feed material. This pneumatic assistance replaces passive gravity drainage, significantly reducing drainage time and increasing extraction capacity without adding complex mechanical moving parts to the rotating system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the pressure parameter by creating a pressure differential between the interior of the rotating baskets and the suction device environment. This pressure change drives faster miscella removal, transforming the drainage process from gravity-dependent to pressure-driven, thereby reducing drainage time while maintaining system simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If longer drainage time is allowed, then more complete miscella removal is achieved, but fewer baskets are available for extraction operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemiscella removal completenessVSAvoidnumber of baskets available for extraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The suction device creates negative pressure that actively pulls miscella from the feed material, achieving complete removal in a shorter time. This allows baskets to complete the drainage cycle faster and return to extraction service more quickly, increasing the number of baskets effectively available for extraction while ensuring thorough miscella removal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The suction device initiates and accelerates the drainage action during the basket's rotation, ensuring miscella removal is completed before the basket needs to be重新filled for extraction. This preliminary completion of drainage ensures no residual miscella remains while minimizing the time baskets are non-productive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If suction device is added to reduce drainage time, then extraction capacity increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrainage speedVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The suction device is positioned externally to the rotating basket assembly, connected via a stationary screen and conduit system. This configuration adds minimal complexity to the rotating components while achieving the desired drainage acceleration through pneumatic action from the stationary suction source.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Solution Approach 2:

The stationary screen acts as an intermediary between the rotating baskets and the suction device. It allows vapor and miscella to pass from the moving baskets to the stationary suction system, enabling the complexity reduction by decoupling the suction function from the rotating mechanism while maintaining effective drainage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If vapor flow is pulled through feed material, then residual miscella decreases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresidual miscella contentVSAvoidsuction energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The suction device pulls vapor phase miscella through the feed material bed, utilizing phase transition principles. The vapor is drawn through the material and condensed or collected downstream, achieving low residual miscella content while the energy required is minimized by leveraging the natural vapor pressure and temperature differential in the extraction system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design reduces drainage time by 30-50% and decreases residual miscella in the extracted material, enhancing extraction capacity and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

A suction device is provided which pulls vapor down through the bed of feed material contained within at least one of the plurality of baskets. This generates a downward flow of vapor through the bed of feed material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure differential: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

A plurality of sprayers are provided within the housing above the plurality of baskets, the plurality of sprayers being operatively connected to at least one of the troughs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCounter-current flow: Convection

Data Source

PatentUS9776113B2Rotatable basket extractor
Publication Date: 2017.10.03 DESMET USA INC
  • US9776113B2 patent drawing
  • US9776113B2 patent drawing
  • US9776113B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotatable basket extractor for use in extracting oil from oleaginous feed material is disclosed. The extractor includes a rotatable rotor that includes a plurality of baskets extending radially outward from a central shaft, and the baskets receive and transport the oleaginous feed material while a motor rotates the baskets between a feed inlet and a feed outlet. The rotor is located within a housing and positioned above a screen through which miscella that drains from the feed material passes. The miscella is collected in a trough located below the screen and is sprayed onto the feed material bed positioned within the baskets in a counter-current manner. A suction device pulls vapor down between the particles of the feed material bed to decrease the drainage time of the miscella through the feed material.