Rotatable Foot Control Barrier for Stability and Compact Storage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional crowd control barriers are either lightweight and easily tipped over or heavy and difficult to move, pose safety risks due to sharp corners and rigidity, require extensive assembly and storage space, and are not easily stackable or transportable.

Innovation Solution

A portable, reusable control barrier with a rotatable foot mechanism that allows for easy setup, stability, and compact storage, featuring a barrier wall with ballast options, interlocking configurations for stacking, and secure advertising displays to minimize risks and enhance usability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If concrete barriers are used to prevent tipping, then stability is improved, but weight and mobility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier stabilityVSAvoidbarrier weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier is divided into modular components: a barrier body and separate support legs that can be independently assembled. This segmentation allows the barrier to achieve stability through proper configuration while maintaining ease of assembly and mobility during transport.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support legs are designed to be adjustable and reconfigurable, allowing the barrier to adapt its stability characteristics based on operational needs. The legs can be positioned at different angles and configurations to provide stability when needed while allowing for easy disassembly and mobility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Strength

If conventional barriers are made of rigid materials, then strength is improved, but safety deteriorates due to sharp corners

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier strengthVSAvoidinjury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier design incorporates rounded corners and curved surfaces instead of sharp edges. This curvature eliminates the harmful sharp corners while maintaining the structural strength of the barrier, thereby reducing the risk of injury to crowds and athletes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The barrier materials and surface parameters are modified to eliminate sharp corners and edges. The design incorporates rounded geometries and smooth surfaces that maintain structural integrity while removing the harmful characteristics that cause injuries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If barriers are made modular and portable, then ease of operation is improved, but stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier setup easeVSAvoidbarrier stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier system is segmented into modular components including the barrier body and separate support legs. This segmentation enables easy assembly and disassembly operations while maintaining stability when properly configured and assembled at the operational site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support legs are designed with adjustable and reconfigurable characteristics, allowing the barrier to transition from a portable state during transport to a stable configuration during use. The legs can be positioned and secured to provide adequate stability while maintaining ease of setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Volume of moving object

If barriers are designed for compact storage, then storage space is reduced, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage volumeVSAvoidbarrier configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier is divided into separate modular components that can be compactly stored individually. The barrier body and support legs can be stored in a compact configuration and assembled at the operational site, reducing storage volume requirements while maintaining simplicity through standardized connection mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The support legs are designed to nest within or alongside the barrier body when not in use, creating a compact storage configuration. This nesting arrangement minimizes the storage volume required while keeping the assembly process simple through predetermined fit-and-fasten connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Data Source

PatentUS7789585B2Control barrier with rotatable legs
Publication Date: 2010.09.07 OTW HLDG CO
  • US7789585B2 patent drawing
  • US7789585B2 patent drawing
  • US7789585B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control barrier includes a barrier wall having a front face and an opposing back face each extending between a top end and an opposing bottom end, a first recess being formed on the front face at the bottom end of the barrier wall. A first slot extends through the barrier wall from the first recess to the back face. A first foot coupled with the barrier wall and being movable between a first position wherein the first foot is at least partially disposed within the recess of the barrier wall and a second position wherein the first foot is rotated a least 45° relative to the first position and is removably positioned within the slot extending through the barrier wall.