Rotatable Handle Mechanism for Stackable Storage Units

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing storage units face challenges in efficiently coupling and decoupling with other units, particularly when space restrictions are present, and in allowing easy transition between carrying and open positions without obstructing the lid's movement.

Innovation Solution

A storage unit design featuring a housing with a pivotable lid and an extendable handle that rotates about an axis, with coupling components on the bottom surface for stacking, and a handle system with multiple segments that can pivot around distinct axes, allowing for adjustable positions that either block or allow lid opening based on handle orientation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the handle is kept in a fixed extended position for easy carrying, then carrying convenience is improved, but the lid cannot be opened due to handle interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecarrying convenienceVSAvoidlid opening capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The handle is designed to be rotatable about an axis relative to the housing, allowing it to dynamically change position between a carrying position (extended) and an open position (retracted or rotated away). This dynamic adjustment resolves the contradiction by enabling the handle to adapt its configuration based on whether carrying or lid opening is the intended operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The handle mechanism is divided into separable components: the handle itself and the housing with which it is rotatably coupled. This segmentation allows independent movement of the handle relative to the housing and lid, enabling the handle to be positioned out of the lid's path while maintaining carrying functionality when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the handle is retracted to allow lid opening, then lid accessibility is improved, but carrying stability is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelid accessibilityVSAvoidcarrying stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The rotatable handle mechanism allows dynamic repositioning: when the lid needs to be opened, the handle can be rotated or retracted to clear the lid's path, improving accessibility. When carrying is required, the handle can be rotated to an extended position for better grip and stability, thus resolving the contradiction through dynamic adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple handle segments rotate around distinct axes for adjustable positioning, then positioning flexibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning flexibilityVSAvoidhandle mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The handle is divided into multiple segments that can rotate independently around distinct axes. Each segment provides a degree of freedom for positioning, allowing the handle to achieve various configurations (extended, retracted, angled) to accommodate different carrying and accessing scenarios. This segmentation enables flexible positioning while keeping each individual rotation mechanism relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The multi-segment rotatable design allows the handle to dynamically adjust its configuration through rotations around different axes. This dynamic adaptability provides positioning flexibility for various operational modes (carrying, stacking, lid opening) without requiring a completely complex mechanism, as each segment's rotation is independently controlled.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If coupling components are added to the bottom surface for stacking, then modular stacking capability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodular stacking capabilityVSAvoidhousing structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bottom surface of the housing is equipped with coupling components that enable the storage unit to function both as a standalone container and as part of a stackable modular system. These coupling components allow the unit to be stacked with identical units, providing versatility without significantly complicating the basic housing structure, as the coupling mechanism integrates with the existing bottom surface design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240315414A1Storage Device with Handle
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP
  • US20240315414A1 patent drawing
  • US20240315414A1 patent drawing
  • US20240315414A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Various carrying mechanisms to transport a storage device, container or unit are shown. The carrying mechanisms actuate between various positions that may interfere with opening a lid of the storage unit. Various configurations of the carrying mechanisms reduce their profile when in use. Also described are multi-segmented carrying mechanisms that provides a beneficial weight distribution while facilitating actuating the carrying mechanism between different positions.