Rotatable Retention Spacer for Decking Joist Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spacers in exterior flooring systems are prone to breaking due to compromised strength and rigidity, leading to mis-alignment and uneven loading, as they are designed to snap off easily for cost-effective manufacturing but lack sufficient rigidity.

Innovation Solution

A spacer design featuring a central region with laterally extending arms and a retention portion that is rotatable and offset, allowing it to be securely locked within a recess of a support joist, preventing vertical movement and removal, and ensuring proper alignment of the spacer arms with flooring elements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If spacer arms are connected to the main spacer body by a frangible region to enable easy snapping off, then ease of manufacture is improved, but strength and rigidity are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidstrength and rigidity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer is divided into modular components: a central body with frangible regions that allow spacer arms to be snapped off. This segmentation enables a single spacer model to serve multiple configurations (one, two, or four arms), improving manufacturing efficiency while maintaining structural integrity through optimized frangible region design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frangible regions are designed with specific geometric parameters (thinner cross-section, reduced material density) that allow controlled breaking under minimal force. This parameter change enables easy arm removal for manufacturing flexibility while the remaining spacer body retains sufficient strength and rigidity for structural support

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If spacer arms are made easily snapable for cost-effective manufacturing, then manufacturing cost is reduced, but reliability is worsened due to potential breaking during use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spacer design segments the structure into a permanent central body and removable arms connected by frangible regions. This allows the critical load-bearing central body to be manufactured with high strength materials and geometry, while the arms can be easily removed if needed, achieving both cost-effectiveness and reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frangible regions provide dynamic adaptability: they remain intact during installation and normal use to ensure reliability, but can be easily broken if arm removal is needed. This dynamic characteristic allows the spacer to transition from a rigid single-model design to a flexible multi-configuration solution without compromising reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the retention portion is rotatable to align spacer arms with flooring elements, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveadaptabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The retention portion is designed to rotate within the recess, providing dynamic adaptability to align spacer arms with different flooring element configurations. This simple rotational movement, enabled by the recess geometry, allows a single spacer model to accommodate various layouts without requiring multiple specialized spacer types, achieving high adaptability with minimal added complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The rotatable retention portion enables a single spacer design to perform multiple functions: accommodating different flooring element orientations, adapting to various recess positions in joists, and providing alignment guidance during installation. This multi-functionality reduces the need for multiple spacer models, offsetting the slight increase in device complexity with significant versatility gains

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11840851B2Support system
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 RYNO LTD
  • US11840851B2 patent drawing
  • US11840851B2 patent drawing
  • US11840851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spacer for support elements of a decking or paving support system, has a central region, at least two spacer arms extending laterally from the central region, and a retention portion coupled to the central region, wherein the retention portion has a longest lateral axis extending laterally and wherein the longest lateral axis lies at an angle to each of the at least two spacer arms.