Rotatable Tab End Closure with Secondary Vent Opening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional beverage container end closures suffer from low, inconsistent, and uneven flow rates due to lack of consideration for inward air flow, which affects the pourability of contents.

Innovation Solution

The design incorporates a primary opening portion and at least one secondary opening portion that can be selectively opened using a rotatable tab, allowing for improved flow characteristics by increasing the opened area and facilitating air intake, with features like transition zones and rotational limiting means to control the opening mechanism.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single opening area is provided in the end closure, then the structure is simple, but the flow rate is low, inconsistent, and uneven

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rateVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The end closure is divided into multiple functional opening areas: a primary opening area for product discharge and one or more secondary vent opening areas for air intake. This segmentation allows simultaneous product flow and air inflow, resolving the contradiction by improving flow rate consistency without requiring a completely complex new structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds a dimensional aspect to the opening system by introducing secondary vent openings at different locations and orientations on the end closure. This multi-dimensional approach to openings enables air to enter from different directions while product exits through the primary opening, improving overall flow characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If a single opening area is used, then the device is simple to operate, but pourability is poor with low and inconsistent flow rates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovepourabilityVSAvoidflow rate consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The pull tab mechanism is designed to serve multiple functions: it can open the primary opening area for product dispensing, and by rotating to different positions, it can also open secondary vent opening areas for air intake. This multi-functionality improves pourability without requiring multiple separate operating mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The pull tab is designed to be rotatable about the rivet axis, allowing dynamic repositioning between different opening areas. This dynamic capability enables the user to select the appropriate opening configuration (primary only, or primary plus secondary vents) based on pouring needs, improving flow rate consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Productivity

If multiple opening areas are added to improve flow rate, then pourability increases, but the opening mechanism becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow rateVSAvoidopening mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A single pull tab mechanism performs multiple opening functions by rotating to different positions. The same tab that opens the primary opening can, when rotated 90-180 degrees, open secondary vent openings. This universal mechanism avoids the need for separate actuators for each opening area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The pull tab mechanism automatically opens the appropriate opening areas based on its position. When pulled upward, it opens the primary opening; when rotated and pulled, it opens secondary vents. The mechanism serves itself by using the same user input (pulling the tab) to activate different opening functions without requiring additional controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Adaptability or versatility

If the pull tab can rotate freely, then it can access multiple opening areas, but uncontrolled rotation may cause unintended opening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to multiple opening areasVSAvoidcontrolled opening
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Rotational limiting features are pre-positioned on the end closure structure to define specific stop positions for the pull tab. These limits are built into the design to prevent over-rotation and ensure the tab only opens intended opening areas when positioned correctly, maintaining reliable controlled opening.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Rotational limiting features act as intermediaries between the freely rotating pull tab and the opening mechanism. These features mediate the rotation by providing physical stops at predetermined angles, allowing the tab to access multiple opening areas while preventing unintended opening through controlled rotational boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3328747B1Container end closure with optional secondary vent opening
Publication Date: 2020.09.09 BALL CORP
  • EP3328747B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3328747B1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B
  • EP3328747B1 patent drawingFigure 3C~3D

AI summary

The present invention relates to an opening device for a beverage container. More specifically, the invention relates to a metal end closure having a primary opening area and at least one optional secondary vent opening which can be opened with the same pull tab. The primary opening area and the secondary vent opening area are defined by a score line which is interrupted by a check slot to inhibit propagation of a fracture along the score line.