Rotating Aperture Optimization for IMRT Planning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current radiation treatment planning methods for intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) face challenges in identifying an optimum set of fields to deliver a desired radiation dose distribution while minimizing dose to surrounding tissues, due to the high degrees of freedom in radiation delivery apparatus.

Innovation Solution

The Rotating Aperture Optimization (RAO) method modifies variables to reduce a cost function by computing a volume dose distribution and optimizing collimator configurations for multiple segments at different angles, using techniques like simulated annealing to iteratively adjust leaf positions and segment weights, ensuring compliance with physical constraints of the multi-leaf collimator.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional two-step treatment planning (fluence map optimization followed by leaf sequencing) is used, then treatment plans can be generated, but the process is time-consuming and does not efficiently identify the optimum set of fields due to high degrees of freedom in radiation delivery apparatus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment planning efficiencyVSAvoidtreatment planning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the fluence map optimization step and the leaf sequencing step into a single unified optimization process. By simultaneously optimizing both the fluence maps and the multi-leaf collimator leaf positions, the system eliminates the sequential two-step approach, thereby reducing computational time and efficiently identifying the optimum treatment fields in one integrated process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Manufacturing precision

If a large number of segments and monitor units are used to achieve desired dose distribution, then target coverage and sparing of critical structures improve, but treatment time increases and equipment wear increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedose distribution precisionVSAvoidtreatment delivery speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the optimization parameters by directly optimizing the physical parameters of the multi-leaf collimator leaf positions and segment weights simultaneously with fluence maps. This parameter integration allows the system to achieve the desired dose distribution precision with fewer segments and monitor units, thereby reducing treatment delivery time and equipment wear while maintaining dosimetric accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If fixed collimator angles are used, then the treatment process is simpler, but the ability to deliver optimal dose distribution to complex target geometries is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment process simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to complex target geometries
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces dynamic collimator angle optimization by allowing the collimator angle to vary as an additional optimization parameter. This enables the system to adapt to complex target geometries by dynamically selecting optimal collimator angles for each segment, thereby improving dose distribution precision for complex targets while maintaining computational efficiency through integrated optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS7734010B2Method and apparatus for planning and delivering radiation treatment
Publication Date: 2010.06.08 BRITISH COLUMBIA CANCER AGENCY BRANCH
  • US7734010B2 patent drawing
  • US7734010B2 patent drawing
  • US7734010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Radiation may be delivered in a number of segments shaped by a multi-leaf collimator. The collimator may be at different angles of rotation for the different segments. A method for planning radiation treatment involves obtaining an optimized set of collimator configurations by a direct aperture optimization method that takes into account collimator rotation. In some embodiments, area constraints are applied to the optimization. Methods according to embodiments of the invention can generate efficient treatment plans.