Rotating Beam Slab Machining for Precise Flexible Cutting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing slab machining machines have complex structures that reduce cutting precision and require larger dimensions, limiting interaxial distances and increasing costs due to complex movements and limited secondary beam length.

Innovation Solution

A machine with a simplified structure featuring a single guide system, a fixed rotation axis, and a movable horizontal beam with independently positionable spindles and cutting tools, allowing for flexible cutting patterns and precision without the need for extensive machine size increases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a secondary beam is added to allow rotation of cutting spindles, then cutting versatility is improved, but device complexity increases and manufacturing precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting versatilityVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is divided into independent functional modules: a horizontal beam for spindle positioning, a rotation mechanism for orientation adjustment, and a support structure for stability. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function without adding unnecessary complexity to the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of rotating the entire beam structure with multiple guide systems, the invention inverts the approach by keeping the beam structure fixed and rotating only the cutting spindles on the beam. This reduces the complexity of guide systems while maintaining cutting versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Adaptability or versatility

If a secondary beam with fifth wheel is added for spindle rotation, then cutting patterns flexibility is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to complex movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting patterns flexibilityVSAvoidcutting precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the rotation function from the complex fifth wheel mechanism and implements it through a simpler dedicated rotation mechanism mounted on the horizontal beam. This separates the positioning function (beam) from the orientation function (rotation mechanism), reducing movement complexity and improving cutting precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The horizontal beam is designed to be movable along the fixed support structures, allowing dynamic adjustment of the cutting spindles' position. The spindles themselves can rotate dynamically to achieve different cutting patterns, providing flexibility without compromising precision through rigid, over-constrained structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Stability of the object's composition

If machine dimensions are increased to support cutting masses, then structural stability is improved, but device complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidmachine dimension complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the support function and the positioning function into a single horizontal beam structure that rests on fixed support structures. This integration provides structural stability while avoiding the need for separate, oversized support components, thereby reducing overall machine complexity and dimensions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The horizontal beam serves multiple functions: it supports the cutting spindles, allows their positioning along the beam, provides a mounting base for the rotation mechanism, and transfers loads to the fixed support structures. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional structural elements, simplifying the machine while maintaining stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240326290A1Machine and plant for machining slabs
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 TONCELLI LUCA
  • US20240326290A1 patent drawing
  • US20240326290A1 patent drawing
  • US20240326290A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Machine (1) for machining slabs (L) made of stone, stone-like, agglomerate or ceramic material, comprising a pair of fixed support structures (12) intended to delimit a working area (A), a horizontal surface (8) for supporting the slabs (L) being machined, which is positioned within the working area (A), a fixed horizontal beam (14) supported by the fixed support structures (12) and a horizontal beam (18) movable with respect to the fixed horizontal beam (14) and comprising at least one spindle (20) slidably mounted on the movable horizontal beam (18) and designed for the mounting of at least one machining tool (22). Also provided are means (32) for moving the movable horizontal beam (18) with respect to the fixed horizontal beam (14) along a predetermined direction of advancing movement (Z) lying in a plane parallel to the support surface (8) and means (34) for rotation of the movable beam (18) with respect to the fixed beam (14) about a fixed rotation axis (R) arranged vertically. The invention also relates to a plant (100) for machining the slabs.