Rotating Cam Robotic Tool Coupling Locking Mechanism
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing robotic tool changers require axial motion of a piston to lock the master and tool modules together, which limits the compactness of the design and poses safety concerns during power loss, as the locking mechanism may fail to maintain coupling.
Innovation Solution
A rotating cam member with multiple surfaces is used to urge ball members radially against an angled surface, locking the modules together, and includes a failsafe mechanism to prevent decoupling in case of power loss, allowing for a more compact design and enhanced safety.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If a piston with axial motion is used to lock the master and tool modules together, then the locking mechanism can be implemented, but the design becomes less compact and safety concerns arise during power loss
Solution Approach 1:
The patent inverts the conventional piston mechanism by using a rotating cam member instead of an axially moving piston. The cam member rotates to urge ball members radially outward against angled surfaces, creating locking forces without requiring axial motion. This inversion resolves the technical contradiction by eliminating the need for complex axial piston movement while maintaining reliable locking through radial force generation.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent transitions from one-dimensional axial motion (piston moving along its axis) to two-dimensional radial motion (cam member rotating and balls moving radially outward). By changing the dimension of motion from axial to radial, the design achieves compactness while maintaining locking reliability. The angled surfaces convert radial ball forces into axial locking forces, solving the contradiction between compact design and reliable locking.
2Device complexity
If a rotating cam member with radial force is used instead of axial piston motion, then compactness is improved, but the mechanism must ensure safety during power loss
Solution Approach 1:
The patent incorporates a failsafe surface on the cam member that is positioned to engage the ball members before any potential unintended rotation can occur during power loss. This preliminary positioning of the failsafe surface ensures that if power is lost, the ball members are already constrained by the failsafe geometry, preventing decoupling. The angled surfaces are also designed to maintain locking forces passively once engaged, requiring positive action to decouple.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent converts the potential harm of power loss (which could cause unintended decoupling) into a benefit by designing the failsafe mechanism so that loss of actuating force automatically causes the ball members to settle into the failsafe position. The gravity and spring forces that could cause decoupling during power loss are instead harnessed to press the balls against the failsafe surface, which geometrically prevents rotation and maintains locking.
3Force
If the cam member rotates to urge ball members against angled surfaces, then locking force is generated, but the mechanism requires multiple surfaces and complex geometry
Solution Approach 1:
The patent designs the cam member with multiple surfaces (actuating surface, failsafe surface, locking surface) that each serve specific functions but are all integrated into a single rotating component. This multi-functionality allows one cam member to perform locking, failing safe, and force generation functions simultaneously, reducing the need for separate components and simplifying the overall mechanism despite the complex geometry of individual surfaces.
Solution Approach 2:
The cam member is segmented into distinct functional surfaces (actuating, failsafe, and locking surfaces) that operate at different stages of the rotation cycle. Each surface is optimized for its specific function, allowing the complex geometry to be broken down into manageable segments with clear purposes. This segmentation makes the complex geometry more manageable and easier to manufacture while maintaining all necessary functions.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The rotating cam member design provides a secure and compact locking mechanism that maintains coupling even during power loss, preventing unintended decoupling and enhancing safety in robotic tool changers.
Implementation Method 1
A rotating cam member having a plurality of surfaces formed therein urges a plurality of ball members in one tool coupling unit radially to contact an angled surface in the other tool coupling unit
Implementation Method 2
Further rotation of the cam member exerts a radial force through the ball members onto the angled surface. A component of that force is directed by the angled surface toward the opposite tool coupling unit, locking the two units together
Data Source
AI summary
In a robotic tool coupler, a rotating cam member having a plurality of surfaces formed therein urges a plurality of ball members in one tool coupling unit radially to contact an angled surface in the other tool coupling unit. Further rotation of the cam member exerts a radial force through the ball members onto the angled surface. A component of that force is directed by the angled surface toward the opposite tool coupling unit, locking the two units together. The cam member may include a failsafe surface and/or a failsafe lobe to maintain the two units locked together in the event of a loss of power to positively actuate the cam member.


