Rotating Drain Closure Assembly for Leak-Resistant Flow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drain closure devices for bathtubs and sinks are prone to wear and damage, leading to leakage and the need for frequent repair or replacement, with mechanical components like pins and springs being easily damaged.

Innovation Solution

A drain closure device featuring a cap and insert that rotate to align apertures and slots, allowing fluid flow when aligned and preventing it when not, with a sealing member to prevent leakage, and designed for easy installation and replacement, accommodating various shapes and sizes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional mechanical components (pins, springs) are used in drain closure devices, then the device can achieve reliable fluid control, but the components are prone to wear and damage requiring frequent repair or replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid control reliabilityVSAvoidcomponent service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The drain closure device is divided into separate functional components: a strainer body that remains fixed in the drain, and a removable closure assembly (cap with insert) that can be detached for replacement. This segmentation allows the durable strainer body to remain in place while only the wear-prone closure components need periodic replacement, resolving the contradiction between maintaining reliable fluid control and extending overall device service life.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cap and insert are designed as inexpensive, easily replaceable components that can be discarded when worn or damaged. Rather than replacing the entire drain closure device, users can simply remove and replace these consumable parts, thereby extending the service life of the overall system while maintaining reliable operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Ease of operation

If multiple mechanical components are used to maintain plug position, then fluid control function is achieved, but the complexity of the device increases and components are easily damaged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow controlVSAvoidnumber of mechanical components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The closure assembly transitions from static mechanical positioning (pins and springs) to a dynamic rotation-based mechanism. The insert rotates within the cap to align or misalign apertures, creating a simple yet effective way to control fluid flow without requiring multiple complex mechanical components to maintain position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention extracts the essential fluid control function from complex mechanical positioning systems and implements it through a simpler rotational alignment mechanism. By removing unnecessary mechanical components and retaining only the critical rotation and sealing functions, the device achieves ease of operation with reduced complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If a seal ring is used to prevent leakage, then fluid containment is improved, but the seal ring may wear and fail over time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid leakageVSAvoidseal ring service life
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing components are integrated into the removable closure assembly rather than being fixed to the strainer body. When the cap and insert are removed for replacement, the sealing members are discarded with them. This approach allows for periodic renewal of sealing components, ensuring continued leak prevention while the strainer body remains in service.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

4Reliability

If the entire drain closure device is replaced when components wear, then reliable operation is restored, but installation complexity and time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrain closure operationVSAvoidreplacement time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The drain closure system is segmented into a permanent strainer body and a removable closure assembly. This segmentation enables selective replacement of only the worn closure components (cap and insert) while leaving the strainer body in place, dramatically reducing replacement time and installation complexity compared to replacing the entire device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The closure assembly is pre-assembled as a complete unit (cap with insert and sealing members) that can be quickly installed or replaced as a single assembly. This preliminary preparation of the closure unit allows for rapid replacement without complex on-site assembly, reducing the time and complexity of restoration after component wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8528122B2Drain closure device
Publication Date: 2013.09.10 WCM IND INC
  • US8528122B2 patent drawing
  • US8528122B2 patent drawing
  • US8528122B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drain closure device that allows a user to selectively open or close the drain closure device to permit or restrict the flow of water therethrough. The drain closure is comprised of a strainer body which houses an insert. The insert has a plurality of openings. A cap is mounted to the insert that has a plurality of openings, which upon rotation of the cap relative to the insert selectively align with the openings on the insert to allow fluid flow from a tub or sink.