Rotating Component Fault Detection via Reference Signal Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting faults in mechanical structures with rotating machine components can only distinguish between normal and developing fault conditions, failing to provide early warnings for specific fault conditions and differentiate between various fault types.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes an input signal representing mechanical vibrations, a reference signal generated based on parameters and rotational speed of the rotating machine component, and processing instructions to select among predetermined condition evaluations, enabling early detection and differentiation of fault conditions through signal processing and analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional vibration analysis methods are used to detect faults, then fault detection capability is provided, but the ability to differentiate between specific fault conditions and provide early warnings is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection precisionVSAvoidfault condition differentiation information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The method segments fault detection into multiple distinct fault condition categories (e.g., inner race fault, outer race fault, ball fault, gear mesh fault) by comparing vibration signals against multiple specialized reference signals, each tailored to detect specific fault types. This segmentation enables precise differentiation between various fault conditions rather than providing a single generic fault detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The method changes parameters by generating reference signals with specific frequency characteristics matched to different fault conditions. By adjusting the frequency and temporal parameters of reference signals based on rotational speed and fault type, the system can selectively detect and differentiate between various fault conditions in the vibration spectrum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If generic fault detection methods are applied, then normal vs. developing fault distinction is achieved, but early warning capability for specific fault conditions is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection reliabilityVSAvoidearly warning time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The method performs preliminary action by continuously comparing vibration signals against multiple pre-configured reference signals that represent different fault conditions. This continuous comparison against specialized references enables early detection and warning of specific fault conditions before they progress to severe failures, providing timely alerts for maintenance planning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring vibration signals, comparing them against reference signals for different fault conditions, and providing real-time condition evaluations. This feedback mechanism enables ongoing assessment of mechanical structure health and provides timely warnings when specific fault conditions are detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If multiple fault condition evaluations are implemented, then fault differentiation capability is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault condition differentiation precisionVSAvoidsignal processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The method uses copying by creating reference signals that replicate the expected vibration patterns for different fault conditions. These reference signals serve as templates that are compared against actual vibration measurements, enabling fault differentiation without requiring complex analysis algorithms. The reference signals act as simplified copies of fault characteristics for direct comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves universality by using a single processing framework that can evaluate multiple fault conditions simultaneously through comparison against different reference signals. This multi-functional approach allows the same basic comparison mechanism to detect various fault types (bearing faults, gear faults, etc.) without requiring separate dedicated systems for each fault type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3092472B1Method and device for providing a condition evaluation of a mechanical structure which includes a rotatable machine component
Publication Date: 2019.11.27 VIBSIM
  • EP3092472B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3092472B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3092472B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for providing a condition evaluation of a mechanical structure which includes a rotating machine component comprises providing an input signal that represents mechanical vibrations in the mechanical structure; and selecting, on the basis of the input signal and a number of reference signals, one among a plurality of predetermined condition evaluations for the mechanical structure. When the rotating machine component comprises a gear transmission, the condition evaluation is selected using amplitude demodulation. When the machine component comprises a rotating bearing, the condition evaluation is selected using cross-correlation.