Rotating Filter Disk Microfiltration for Wastewater Solids Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microfiltration machines for wastewater reuse face inefficiencies due to irregular filter disk surfaces, high energy consumption, and inability to meet stringent regulations for total solid suspended particle content below 5 mg/l, as well as maintenance and structural complexities.

Innovation Solution

The machine features filter disks with continuous and flat inner surfaces, reduced weight, and a simplified structure, allowing for higher rotation speeds, lower energy consumption, and improved filtration efficiency, along with enhanced backwashing mechanisms and a toroidal guard for splash prevention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If disk diameter is increased to handle higher flow rates, then filtration capacity is improved, but disk surface irregularity increases making particle collection difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration capacityVSAvoiddisk surface flatness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The large disk surface is segmented into multiple smaller filter elements arranged in a modular pattern. Each filter element is a small, precisely manufactured component with consistent flatness, while the overall disk maintains large diameter for high filtration capacity. This segmentation allows manufacturing precision to be maintained at the element level while achieving high productivity at the system level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different zones of the disk are designed with locally optimized properties. The filter elements are concentrated in specific radial zones where flow patterns and particle deposition are most effective, while other zones accommodate structural support and washing mechanisms. This local quality approach ensures that each region of the large disk performs its specific function optimally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If duct edges are positioned closer to disk surface to improve particle collection, then filtration efficiency increases, but risk of mesh damage from interferences increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration efficiencyVSAvoidmesh damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The collection duct is segmented into multiple smaller channels that run parallel to the disk surface. These segmented ducts can be positioned closer to the filter elements without requiring a single large clearance, as each duct serves a localized area. This segmentation allows efficient particle collection while maintaining safe distances to prevent mesh damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A protective intermediary layer or structure is introduced between the duct edges and the filter mesh. This intermediary element acts as a buffer that prevents direct contact and potential damage to the mesh while still allowing the duct to effectively collect particles. The intermediary maintains the necessary clearance while preserving filtration efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If disk rotation speed is increased to improve dynamic filtration effect, then particle blocking efficiency increases, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefiltration effectivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The disk rotation is optimized to operate at variable speeds with periodic adjustments rather than continuous high-speed rotation. During normal filtration, the disk rotates at a moderate speed to maintain the dynamic tangential effect. During backwashing cycles, the rotation speed is reduced or reversed. This periodic action maintains filtration effectiveness while significantly reducing average energy consumption compared to constant high-speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operational parameters including rotation speed, flow rate, and washing intensity based on filtration conditions. By adjusting these parameters in response to actual performance needs, the system maintains high filtration effectiveness when required while minimizing energy consumption during steady-state operation or between cleaning cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Strength

If disk mass is increased to withstand hydraulic loads, then structural strength is improved, but moment of inertia increases requiring higher motor power

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehydraulic load resistanceVSAvoidmotor power requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The disk structure utilizes composite materials combining high-strength, low-density materials such as fiber-reinforced polymers or aluminum alloys with strategic reinforcement zones. This composite construction provides the necessary strength to withstand hydraulic loads while keeping the overall mass and moment of inertia low, thereby reducing the motor power required for rotation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The disk is segmented into a lightweight central hub and peripheral filter element mounts connected by thin radial spokes. This segmentation places structural material only where absolutely necessary for strength, minimizing overall mass. The filter elements themselves provide additional structural support, allowing the use of lighter disk materials that reduce rotational inertia and motor power requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration achieves significantly lower total solid particle content, reduced energy consumption, extended bearing life, and easier maintenance, while meeting stringent regulatory requirements and improving filtration flow rates.

Implementation Method 1

uses disks with filter meshes operating with the principle of 'dynamic tangential filtration', which implies that, as the disks rotate, the direction of the incoming flow is substantially parallel to the filter disks, whereby the particles that move over them have a velocity with a main component parallel to the flow and a second component perpendicular thereto

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDynamic tangential filtration:

Implementation Method 2

Solid particles deposited on disk meshes are periodically removed by jet washing and backwashing means, directed against the outer surfaces of the disks, to urge them toward a collecting duct

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJet washing: Jet

Data Source

PatentEP2879773B1Machine for continuous microfiltration of process and waste water, for reuse thereof in agriculture and industry
Publication Date: 2021.04.28 NUOVE ENERGIE
  • EP2879773B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2879773B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP2879773B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

A continuous microfiltration machine for removing suspended solid particles from process and waste water comprises a container (2) with an inlet conduit (4) defining a flow direction (F), and having therein an influent chamber (7) for feeding the liquid to be filtered, a treatment chamber (8) with a bottom wall (9), at least one pair of filter disks (1 0) keyed to a shaft (1 2) perpendicular to the flow direction (F) and having inner filter surfaces (1 0') outer surfaces (1 0") and outer peripheral edges (1 5) in sliding contact with the bottom wall (9), an effluent chamber (1 7) for receiving the filtered liquid, with a discharge conduit (1 8), drive means (1 3, 14) for imparting rotation to the disks, first jet washing means (20) directed against the outer surfaces (1 0") of the disks (1 0) for removing the particles retained thereby, a first collecting duct (24) for collecting the removed particles, which is interposed between the disks (1 0) and has substantially parallel side edges (25) located at a predetermined minimum distance (D) from the inner surfaces (1 0') of the disks (1 0). The inner surfaces (1 0') of the disks are substantially flat and continuous surfaces, with a flatness error (ε) smaller than said predetermined minimum distance (D).