Rotating Jig Fabrication of Pressure Vessel Support Frames

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The conventional manufacturing process for large support frames of pressure vessels, such as those used in submarines, relies heavily on manual handling, welding, and machining, leading to variability in quality and style due to human skill inconsistencies, which results in time-consuming rework and inconsistent properties.

Innovation Solution

A fabrication system comprising a jig assembly and clamping system that supports and positions sub-elements relative to one another, allowing for automated operations at dedicated workstations to join and shape the support frame, reducing manual interaction and ensuring consistent quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual handling, welding and machining are used for sub-elements, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but manufacturing precision and consistency deteriorate due to human skill variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual operation flexibilityVSAvoidquality consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with automated robotic systems. Robots perform welding, machining, and handling tasks with consistent precision, eliminating human skill variability while maintaining operational flexibility through programmable control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a robotic system as an intermediary between the operator and the sub-elements. The robot acts as a mediator that executes precise operations based on programmed instructions, ensuring consistent quality while the operator maintains overall process control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If multiple operators work on large sub-elements, then productivity is maintained through continuous work, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to variability in style and quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous manufacturingVSAvoidquality uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces multiple human operators with a single robotic system that can continuously perform operations without variation. The robot maintains consistent quality across all sub-elements while operating continuously, eliminating the quality variability introduced by human operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system enables continuous operation without the need for operator shifts or breaks. The robot can perform welding, machining, and handling tasks in an uninterrupted sequence, maintaining both productivity and quality consistency through automated continuous action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual welding and machining are performed, then adaptability to different sub-element configurations is maintained, but manufacturing precision and repeatability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess adaptabilityVSAvoidrepeatability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual operations with programmable robotic systems that can be reconfigured through software to handle different sub-element configurations. This maintains adaptability while ensuring repeatable precision through consistent automated execution of programmed tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system allows for changes in operational parameters through programming rather than physical reconfiguration. By modifying software parameters, the system can adapt to different sub-element configurations while maintaining repeatable precision through consistent automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If automated workstations are used for joining and shaping sub-elements, then manufacturing precision and consistency are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system performs multiple functions including welding, machining, and handling through a single integrated platform. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized equipment, managing device complexity while maintaining high manufacturing precision across different operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines multiple manufacturing operations (welding, machining, handling) into a single automated robotic system. By merging these functions into one integrated platform, the system achieves high precision while managing complexity through consolidation rather than proliferation of separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP4422822B1Fabrication system for the manufacture of a support frame for a pressure vessel, and method of manufacture of a support frame for a pressure vessel with such fabrication system
Publication Date: 2025.11.26 BAE SYSTEMS PLC
  • EP4422822B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4422822B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4422822B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The present application relates to a fabrication system (100) for the manufacture of a support frame (10) for a pressure vessel. The support frame (10) is fabricated from a plurality of sub-elements (204). The fabrication system (100) comprises a jig assembly (300), a clamping system mounted on the jig assembly (300) and the jig assembly (300) being rotatably mounted about a rotation axis (302), and extending out radially from the rotation axis (302) to an outer edge. A plurality of workstations (600, 602, 604) are arranged around the outer edge of the jig assembly (300), located and configured to perform operations on the sub-elements (204). The plurality of workstations (600, 602, 604) are mounted in a fixed position, the jig assembly (300) being rotatable about the rotation axis (302) relative to the workstations (600, 602, 604).