Rotating Electric Machine Control Device Torque Ripple Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rotating electric machine control devices face challenges in effectively coordinating the control of multiple systems, particularly in IPM motors, due to differences in d-axis and q-axis inductance, leading to inefficiencies in torque control and increased noise and vibration.

Innovation Solution

A rotating electric machine control device with a machine-electronics integrated configuration, utilizing two control units that communicate to optimize current supply phase differences between motor windings, reducing torque ripple and heat generation, and distributing electric current evenly between systems to improve output torque and reduce temperature-dependent errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If d-axis current control is performed in the same manner as q-axis in a multi-system control configuration, then control simplicity is maintained, but torque ripple increases and control accuracy deteriorates due to unaccounted reluctance torque effects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol structureVSAvoidtorque control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different control strategies to different axes: the q-axis uses conventional feedback control while the d-axis incorporates additional reluctance torque compensation. This local differentiation allows each axis to be controlled according to its specific characteristics, improving overall torque control accuracy without unnecessarily complicating the entire control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the d-axis current control by introducing a compensation term that accounts for reluctance torque effects. This parameter change in the control law (adding the reluctance torque compensation component) enables more accurate torque control while maintaining a relatively simple control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If instruction values are transmitted from master control unit to slave control unit, then coordinated control is achieved, but communication overhead increases and control response time is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoordinated controlVSAvoidcontrol response time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The master control unit pre-calculates and transmits instruction values to the slave control unit before they are needed for execution. This preliminary action allows the slave unit to have the instruction values ready, reducing the actual control response time while maintaining coordinated control through the pre-established communication framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If current supply phase difference between motor windings is not optimized, then control simplicity is maintained, but torque ripple increases and noise and vibration are generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol algorithmVSAvoidtorque ripple and noise
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts the current supply phase difference between motor windings based on operating conditions. By making the phase difference a variable parameter rather than a fixed value, the system can optimize torque output and minimize torque ripple and noise across different operating ranges without requiring a fundamentally complex control algorithm.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enables improved torque output, reduced noise and vibration, and enhanced control accuracy by optimizing current distribution and communication between control units, effectively addressing the inefficiencies in IPM motor control.

Implementation Method 1

a rotating electric machine control device with a machine-electronics integrated configuration, utilizing two control units that communicate to optimize current supply phase differences between motor windings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

distributing electric current evenly between systems to improve output torque and reduce temperature-dependent errors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11285992B2Rotating electric machine control device
Publication Date: 2022.03.29 DENSO CORP
  • US11285992B2 patent drawing
  • US11285992B2 patent drawing
  • US11285992B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotating electric machine control device has an electronic control unit, or an ECU that controls driving of a motor having motor windings, and includes mutually-communicable plural control units. The control unit includes a basic instruction calculation unit, a field-weakening calculation unit, and a current control calculation unit and a PWM (pulse width modulation) output unit. The current control calculation unit and the PWM output unit generate a PWM signal based on d-axis current instruction values and q-axis current instruction values that are calculated based on basic current instruction values and field-weakening d-axis current instruction value. At least a part of the instruction values used for generation of the PWM signal is shared by the plural control units.