Rotating Harmonic Rejection Mixer With Cyclic Gain-Stage Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional harmonic rejection mixers face challenges in effectively rejecting harmonic frequencies introduced by non-sinusoidal local oscillator signals due to device mismatches and phase deviations, leading to performance degradation and increased power consumption.

Innovation Solution

A rotating harmonic rejection mixer design that cyclically rotates the mixed signal across multiple gain stages, using a master clock signal to improve matching and reduce harmonic rejection, while minimizing power and area consumption by employing smaller device sizes and better-matched passive components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple mixers are used in conventional harmonic rejection mixers, then harmonic rejection capability is improved, but device area and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharmonic rejectionVSAvoiddevice area
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the mixing function across multiple mixer stages (first mixer stage, second mixer stage, third mixer stage) that process the signal sequentially. Each stage contributes to harmonic rejection while sharing the processing load, allowing effective harmonic suppression without requiring all mixers to operate at full power simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic switching of the mixed signal between different gain stages using a rotating switch. The signal is rotated to different stages in a cyclic manner (first stage during first time period, second stage during second time period, third stage during third time period), enabling harmonic rejection through time-division multiplexing rather than requiring all stages to operate continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Object-affected harmful factors

If multiple mixers are used in conventional harmonic rejection mixers, then harmonic rejection capability is improved, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharmonic rejectionVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The rotating switch periodically connects the mixed signal to different gain stages at different time periods. During each time period, only the active gain stage consumes significant power while others remain inactive or in low-power state. This time-division approach achieves harmonic rejection through multiple stages without requiring all stages to consume full power simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically switches the signal path between different gain stages using a rotating switch controlled by phase-shifted clock signals. This dynamic switching allows the system to activate only the necessary mixer stages for current processing needs, reducing overall power consumption compared to having all stages continuously active.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If device sizes are increased to reduce random mismatches, then matching precision is improved, but device area and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice matchingVSAvoiddevice area
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the mixing function across multiple separate mixer stages rather than using a single large mixer. Each individual mixer stage can use smaller, more easily matched devices while collectively achieving the required performance through their combined operation and periodic switching between stages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution achieves improved harmonic rejection with reduced power and area consumption, enabling dynamic control of harmonic rejection based on incoming signal frequency and preventing flicker noise, thus enhancing the performance of receivers like television and radio systems.

Implementation Method 1

the mixer typically multiplies the incoming wireless signal with a local oscillator signal to produce a signal that has spectral energy that is distributed at sums and differences of the local oscillator and incoming signal's frequencies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMixing:

Implementation Method 2

a rotating switch to cyclically switch the mixed signal to a plurality of gain stages

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRotational switching:

Implementation Method 3

each scaling factor that scales the incoming signal may be in accordance with a predetermined sinusoidal function

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScaling:

Implementation Method 4

the outputs of each mixer stage are summed to provide a downconverted (or upconverted) output

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSummation:

Data Source

PatentUS8538366B2Rotating harmonic rejection mixer
Publication Date: 2013.09.17 SKYWORKS SOLUTIONS INC
  • US8538366B2 patent drawing
  • US8538366B2 patent drawing
  • US8538366B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, the present invention includes a mixer circuit to receive and generate a mixed signal from a radio frequency (RF) signal and a master clock signal, a switch stage coupled to an output of the mixer circuit to rotatingly switch the mixed signal to multiple gain stages coupled to the switch stage, and a combiner to combine an output of the gain stages.