Rotating Nacelle Flow Control Devices for Inlet Separation Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ultra-short turbofan engine nacelles face flow separation issues at high angles of attack and crosswind conditions due to their short inlet design, leading to flow distortion, performance reduction, increased noise, and structural challenges, which existing solutions like longer inlets or blow-in doors fail to adequately address without increasing drag and weight or noise.

Innovation Solution

A deployable flow control system with rotating flow control devices having a curved, blunt nose is mounted on the nacelle, extending from the leading edge to increase the effective radius and improve airflow turning angles, using actuators to rotate the devices from a retracted to an extended position, particularly in lower quadrants of the inlet circumference for adverse conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If the inlet is made shorter to reduce weight and drag, then fuel burn is reduced, but flow separation occurs at high angles of attack and crosswind conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel burnVSAvoidflow attachment
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a deployable flow control device that can dynamically change its configuration based on operating conditions. The device rotates from a retracted position during normal cruise to an extended position during adverse conditions (high angle of attack, crosswind), allowing the inlet geometry to adapt dynamically rather than being fixed. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining short inlet for cruise efficiency while providing flow control capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The flow control device changes the effective leading edge radius and inlet geometry parameters dynamically. When extended, it increases the effective leading edge radius and modifies the inlet shape to promote flow attachment. This parameter change allows the same physical structure to provide different aerodynamic characteristics based on operational requirements, resolving the trade-off between short inlet benefits and flow separation risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the inlet is made longer to prevent flow separation, then flow attachment is improved, but drag and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow attachmentVSAvoiddrag
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of a permanently longer inlet, the patent uses a deployable flow control device that extends only when needed. During cruise conditions, the device remains retracted, maintaining the original short inlet geometry and associated low drag characteristics. When flow separation becomes a risk, the device extends to provide the necessary flow control, thus avoiding the continuous drag penalty of a longer inlet while still preventing flow separation when required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If blow-in doors are used to control inlet flow, then flow separation is mitigated, but noise increases and structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow controlVSAvoidnoise
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs relatively simple rotating flow control devices with blunt noses rather than complex blow-in door mechanisms. These devices provide effective flow control through their geometric configuration and rotation capability, avoiding the need for complex door structures, actuators, and seals that characterize blow-in doors. This approach reduces both the structural complexity and the noise generation associated with complex moving parts while maintaining flow control effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution effectively reduces flow separation and distortion, maintaining performance and reducing noise and structural demands by adapting the inlet geometry dynamically to adverse conditions while preserving the short nacelle design for optimal cruise performance.

Implementation Method 1

flow control devices each having a body, a curved, blunt nose and a trailing edge... configured to rotate the body about a leading edge of an inlet of the nacelle... to an extended position in which the nose lies forward of said leading edge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic flow control:

Data Source

PatentEP3421373B1Rotating devices for mitigation of adverse flow conditions in an ultra-short nacelle inlet
Publication Date: 2021.03.24 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3421373B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3421373B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3421373B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

A flow control system on an aircraft engine nacelle incorporates a plurality of flow control devices (16) each having a body (17). A second plurality of actuators (24) is coupled to the body (17) of an associated one of the flow control devices (16). The actuator (24) rotates the body (17) about a leading edge (18) of an inlet of a nacelle (14) from a retracted position to an extended position.