Rotating Packed Bed with Co-Counter Current Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rotating packed beds for absorption or desorption processes require significant energy to operate due to increased pressure loss and frictional forces, limiting their efficiency and scalability compared to stationary packed beds.

Innovation Solution

A rotating packed bed design featuring two packed beds arranged in series on a shaft, with gas flowing co-currently through the first bed and then counter-currently through the second, utilizing centrifugal force to accelerate gas flow and reduce energy requirements, while allowing for flexible design and operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If a rotating packed bed is used to increase specific surface area and reduce column volume, then the separation efficiency per volume is improved, but the pressure loss across the bed increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecolumn volumeVSAvoidpressure loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The rotating packed bed is divided into multiple stages or sections along the rotation axis, with each stage having optimized packing density and flow distribution. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high surface area while managing pressure drop across individual stages, preventing excessive pressure loss in any single section.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The packing structure is designed to adapt dynamically to rotational speed variations, with flexible support structures and adjustable packing densities that optimize performance across different operating conditions. This dynamic design allows the system to maintain efficient mass transfer while adjusting pressure loss characteristics based on rotational velocity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If a rotating packed bed operates with counter-current flow to achieve high separation efficiency, then the separation performance is improved, but the energy requirement for gas acceleration increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveseparation efficiencyVSAvoidenergy for gas acceleration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs centrifugal force fields to create equipotential flow paths where gas and liquid phases move in coordinated patterns. By utilizing the rotating reference frame, the design achieves counter-current mass transfer efficiency while reducing the net energy input required, as the centrifugal field provides part of the driving force for flow circulation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

Solution Approach 2:

The rotating packed bed design allows the system to utilize its own rotational momentum and centrifugal effects to maintain flow circulation and mixing. The rotation itself generates the necessary forces for phase separation and mass transfer, reducing external energy input requirements while maintaining high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Power

If the rotation speed is increased to enhance mass transfer coefficient, then the mass transfer efficiency is improved, but the power requirement for operation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass transfer coefficientVSAvoidpower requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system optimizes mass transfer by changing multiple parameters simultaneously - rotation speed, packing material properties, phase flow rates, and geometric configuration. By adjusting these parameters in combination rather than relying solely on high rotation speed, the design achieves high mass transfer coefficients while controlling power consumption through balanced parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration reduces energy consumption, enhances mass transfer coefficients, and increases design flexibility, enabling more efficient and cost-effective gas-liquid separation processes across a larger effective flow path with reduced apparatus size.

Implementation Method 1

The liquid is fed in the form of a droplet spray or jet into the packed bed at the eye of the rotor, passes over the packing under the influence of the centrifugal force in a radially outward direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCentrifugal force: Centrifugal Force

Implementation Method 2

In stationary packed beds the liquid passing through the packing is only acted on by gravity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentUS8679232B2Rotating packed bed
Publication Date: 2014.03.25 GENERAL ELECTRIC TECH GMBH
  • US8679232B2 patent drawing
  • US8679232B2 patent drawing
  • US8679232B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A rotating packed bed RPB that includes a first and second packed bed both arranged on the same rotatable shaft. A gas is directed via a gas inlet through the first packed bed in co-current flow with a liquid in a radially outward direction towards the outer radius of the packed bed. The liquid enters the first packed bed via a first liquid inlet. The gas exiting the first packed bed is directed to the second packed bed and forced through it in a radially inward direction in counter-current flow with a liquid, which enters through a second liquid inlet. The arrangement allows an operation of the rotating packed bed with less energy compared to RPBs of the prior art operating in counter-current flow only. The apparatus allows low-cost design and high design flexibility.