Rotating Rooftop Skyport Layout for Safe High-Throughput eSTOL Operations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Urban air mobility systems face challenges in finding suitable landing and takeoff infrastructure within densely populated areas, requiring safe, efficient, and publicly acceptable solutions for high-frequency operations of eVTOL aircraft.

Innovation Solution

A rotating double-deck skyport system designed for installation on high-rise buildings, featuring dual runways, robotic battery swapping, and a climate-controlled lower deck for efficient operations, ensuring safety, public acceptance, and high utilization rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a skyport is installed on building tops in densely populated urban areas, then land use efficiency is improved and ground space is preserved, but safety risks increase due to proximity to populated areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveground spaceVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The skyport system transitions ground-based operations to aerial operations by installing landing platforms on building rooftops. This dimensional shift from ground level to elevated positions allows aircraft operations to occur above densely populated areas rather than within them, preserving ground space while enhancing safety by creating vertical separation between aircraft and people on the ground.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Productivity

If high-frequency takeoffs and landings are implemented, then productivity is improved, but safety risks increase due to higher operational density

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft throughputVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The skyport employs a rotating double-deck structure that can dynamically reconfigure its configuration. The rotation mechanism allows the platform to orient different runway and gate combinations toward the wind direction, optimizing aircraft performance and safety margins. This dynamic adaptation enables high-frequency operations while maintaining safety by continuously adjusting to optimal configurations rather than operating from a fixed, potentially suboptimal arrangement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The skyport divides the platform into multiple decks with separate runway and gate areas. This segmentation allows simultaneous or near-simultaneous operations on different decks, increasing throughput while maintaining safety distances between aircraft. The physical separation of operations into distinct zones prevents congestion and reduces safety risks associated with high-density operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If a rotating double-deck structure is used, then aircraft throughput is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft throughputVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rotating double-deck structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it provides separate runway areas for takeoff and landing, accommodates multiple aircraft gates, enables wind-directional optimization through rotation, and allows vertical stacking to double the capacity within the same footprint. This multi-functionality justifies the increased structural complexity by delivering proportional benefits in throughput and operational flexibility that a simpler structure could not achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of time

If rapid battery swapping is implemented, then turnaround time is reduced, but device complexity increases due to robotic systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveturnaround timeVSAvoidrobotic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic battery swapping system operates autonomously without requiring human intervention during the swap process. The system self-manages the complex tasks of locating, removing, replacing, and recharging batteries through automated robotic mechanisms. This self-service capability reduces turnaround time to minutes while containing complexity within the automated system itself, rather than requiring complex human coordination and manual procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3891070B1Skyport for estol
Publication Date: 2024.10.23 MOMBRINIE BRUNO
  • EP3891070B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3891070B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3891070B1 patent drawingFigure 4A

AI summary

An urban air mobility building-top skyport for landing, loading and unloading, servicing, and parking short field takeoff and landing (STOL) aircraft, which includes a rotatable flight deck having at least one runway on which aircraft takeoff and land; a rotatable lower deck immediately below the flight deck and including an aircraft taxiway surrounding an enclosed central terminal with an elevator bank; and first and second aircraft ramps connecting the flight deck and the lower deck on which to taxi aircraft between the flight deck and the lower deck. A battery-swap station robotically replaces depleted batteries with fully charged batteries without the need for aircraft to cease moving at slow taxi speeds at any point during the process.