Rotating Wind Turbine Tower with Asymmetric Airfoil Cross-Section

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional wind turbine towers are fixed and not aerodynamically shaped, leading to inefficiencies in material usage and increased weight and cost due to the need to withstand wind loads from all directions, and pose challenges in transporting large structural components and optimizing structural design for variable wind directions.

Innovation Solution

A rotatable wind turbine tower with a wing-like or triangular shape, featuring a narrow leading edge and a broad trailing edge, made of high modulus materials, which can rotate to align with wind direction, optimizing structural loads and reducing drag through segmented construction and efficient material placement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a fixed cylindrical tower is used to withstand wind loads from all directions, then structural strength is ensured, but weight and material usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural strengthVSAvoidtower weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The tower is designed to rotate dynamically to align with wind direction rather than remaining fixed. This allows the structure to present a narrow profile to the wind, reducing aerodynamic loads and enabling significant weight reduction while maintaining structural integrity under variable loading conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The tower employs an asymmetric airfoil cross-section with a narrow leading edge and broader trailing edge. This asymmetric geometry optimizes aerodynamic performance by minimizing wind resistance when aligned with the wind, allowing the structure to withstand loads more efficiently and reduce overall material requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Stability of the object's composition

If a fixed tower design is used, then structural stability is maintained, but adaptability to variable wind directions is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural stabilityVSAvoidadaptability to wind direction
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The tower incorporates a rotation mechanism that enables it to dynamically adjust its orientation to track wind direction. This dynamic adaptability allows the structure to maintain optimal alignment with varying wind conditions while bearing loads more efficiently, combining stability with environmental responsiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The tower structure serves multiple functions: it supports the rotor and nacelle, withstands aerodynamic and gravitational loads, and actively tracks wind direction through rotation. This multi-functionality enhances both adaptability to variable winds and overall structural efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of manufacture

If traditional fixed tower construction is used, then manufacturing simplicity is maintained, but material efficiency and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidmaterial efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The tower is divided into multiple modular segments that can be manufactured separately and assembled on-site. This segmentation enables the use of optimized materials and construction techniques for each segment while reducing transportation constraints and overall material usage compared to traditional monolithic towers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The tower utilizes composite materials with high strength-to-weight ratios, such as fiber-reinforced polymers. These composite materials enable the construction of a lighter, more material-efficient structure that maintains the required structural performance while reducing overall material consumption and cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The rotatable tower design allows for predictable structural loading, efficient material utilization, reduced weight and transportation costs, and enhanced energy production by maintaining optimal orientation with the wind, minimizing wind resistance and structural stress.

Implementation Method 1

The narrow leading edge faces the wind direction and minimizes wind drag and turbulence

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAerodynamic drag: Drag

Data Source

PatentUS8061964B2Hybrid multi-element tapered rotating tower
Publication Date: 2011.11.22 ZUTECK MICHAEL
  • US8061964B2 patent drawing
  • US8061964B2 patent drawing
  • US8061964B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The specification discloses a rotating turbine tower. The tower rotates to maintain the turbine facing into the wind. This allows structure optimization. The tower structure is comprised of a leading edge and a trailing edge, with joining panels between the edge structures. The tower edges are the main structural components of the tower. The separation of the edges tapers to follow the bending moment on the tower, reducing the need to taper material thickness. The tapering shape of the tower structure matches the primary edgewise moment distribution. The tower can be assembled on site from components, thereby facilitating transportation to the tower site. The material properties and shape can be selected based upon the tower maintaining a near constant orientation with the wind. This can save weight and costs. The tower architecture can be of differing shapes such as a triangle or a structure tapering at each end.