Rotating Wheel Grid Arms for Variable Tire and Track Widths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle towing systems face challenges in accommodating a wide range of track widths and tire sizes, as conventional wheel grids are not adaptable enough to safely engage and lift tires of varying dimensions without causing damage or requiring complex adjustments.

Innovation Solution

A wheel grid system with a crossbar and L-arms that can rotate into a stowed position, featuring cantilevered crossbar ends and adjustable L-arms with extension members and wheel brace members, allowing for flexible engagement and lifting of tires across different vehicle types, including those with smaller or larger tires and varying track widths.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional wheel grids are used, then they can engage and lift tires, but they cannot accommodate a wide range of track widths and tire sizes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccommodation of track widths and tire sizesVSAvoidcomplexity of adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The L-arms are made rotatable relative to the crossbar, allowing dynamic adjustment of the distance between the crossbar and wheel brace members. This enables the wheel grid to adapt to different track widths and tire sizes by rotating the L-arms to appropriate positions, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and fixed structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The wheel grid is divided into separable components: the crossbar, the L-arms, and the wheel brace members. The L-arms can be independently rotated and positioned, allowing flexible configuration for different vehicle types without requiring complex overall adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If the crossbar and wheel brace members are positioned far apart, then larger track widths can be accommodated, but clearance may be insufficient for smaller tires

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclearance for different tire sizesVSAvoiddistance between crossbar and wheel brace members
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The rotatable L-arms enable dynamic adjustment of the effective distance between the crossbar and wheel brace members. By rotating the L-arms to different angles, the system can reduce this distance for smaller tires (providing proper clearance) or increase it for larger track widths, resolving the length-clearance contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the geometric parameters of the L-arms through rotation, altering the distance and angle between components. This parameter adjustment allows the same structure to provide appropriate clearance for small tires while maintaining capability for larger track widths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the wheel grid is fixed in position, then it is stable, but it cannot allow angled engagement or be stored safely when not in use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveangled engagement capabilityVSAvoidstability of wheel grid position
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The wheel grid is designed with rotatable components (L-arms relative to crossbar, and the entire assembly relative to the boom) that provide stability during operation while enabling angular adjustment for different engagement scenarios. When not in use, the L-arms can be rotated to a stowed position, eliminating safety hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The L-arms are pre-configured with rotation capability that allows them to be positioned at appropriate angles before engagement. This preliminary angular adjustment facilitates angled engagement of vehicles while maintaining operational stability once positioned.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the L-arms remain extended during towing, then they can engage tires, but they create safety hazards when not in use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengagement capabilityVSAvoidsafety hazards from extended components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The L-arms are designed to be rotatable into a stowed position that is flush with or retracted from the vehicle body when not in use. This dynamic positioning eliminates safety hazards from extended components while maintaining reliable engagement capability when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The engagement function is extracted from a fixed extended position to a dynamically adjustable position. The L-arms can be rotated out of the stowed position only when engagement is required, separating the engagement capability from the potential safety hazard of permanently extended components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS20240001835A1Automatic wheel grid
Publication Date: 2024.01.04 OSHKOSH CORPORATION
  • US20240001835A1 patent drawing
  • US20240001835A1 patent drawing
  • US20240001835A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A wheel grid includes a crossbar configured to be coupled to a boom of a tow vehicle and including a distal tip. The wheel grid further includes an L-arm rotatably coupled to the crossbar at a proximal end of the L-arm and configured to rotate from an engaged position to a stowed position. As the L-arm rotates from the engaged position to the stowed position, a distal portion of the L-arm intersects with a vertical line passing through the respective left or right distal tip of the crossbar. In the stowed position, the distal portion of the L-arm is positioned laterally inward relative to the distal tip of the crossbar.