Rotation Resistant Exercise Device With Variable Braking Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing hand-held exercise devices are limited in providing variable resistance and full-body movements, primarily focusing on hand, wrist, and forearm muscles, while neglecting the engagement of upper body muscle groups like the chest, back, shoulders, and core, and lacking variability to accommodate different user strengths.

Innovation Solution

A portable exercise device with hemispherical housings connected by an elongated bolt and a compressive spring, allowing for adjustable rotational resistance and multiple grip options, enabling full-body workouts by engaging core, pectoral, back, shoulders, hips, and lower body muscles through resisted twisting motions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If existing hand-held exercise devices use gravity-based resistance (dumbbells, kettle bells), then the device structure is simple, but the application is limited and cannot provide variable resistance for different muscle groups

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance variabilityVSAvoiddevice structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device employs a dynamic resistance mechanism where a spring-loaded piston moves within a cylinder, allowing the resistance to vary continuously during the exercise motion. The resistance force changes as the piston moves, providing variable resistance that adapts to different muscle groups and exercise phases without requiring multiple fixed-weight components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The resistance parameter is changed by varying the spring constant and the position of the piston within the cylinder. By adjusting the spring compression and the piston's travel distance, the device can provide different resistance levels for different muscle groups, enabling one device to replace multiple fixed-weight equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If exercise devices use axially aligned handles (Simon, Nieman), then the device is simple to manufacture, but it only exercises hands, wrists, and forearms and prevents full body movements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement rangeVSAvoidgrip configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device is designed with a universal grip configuration where the handles are positioned to allow multiple gripping styles (palms facing each other, palms facing away, or side grip). This universal design enables the same device to be used for various exercise types targeting different muscle groups including chest, back, shoulders, and core, making it multi-functional without complicating the basic structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If elastic resistance devices automatically snap back to resting state (Clementi, Roehlk), then the mechanism is simple, but resistance is only provided in one direction and cannot accommodate different user strengths

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance directionVSAvoidresistance mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device uses a spring-loaded piston system that provides resistance in both directions of movement. The spring acts as a counterweight mechanism, offering resistive force whether the user pushes or pulls, eliminating the need for automatic snap-back mechanisms while providing bidirectional resistance training that accommodates different user strengths and exercise requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Adaptability or versatility

If devices provide fixed resistance levels, then the device is simple to operate, but it cannot challenge users of different strength levels or different muscle groups

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance levelVSAvoidadjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The resistance level is dynamically adjusted through the spring-loaded piston mechanism that moves freely within the cylinder during exercise. The resistance varies continuously based on the piston position and spring compression, allowing users of different strength levels to benefit from the same device without requiring manual adjustment mechanisms, maintaining ease of operation while providing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device provides a dynamic and efficient full-body workout by allowing resistance in both directions of movement, enhancing traditional exercises and enabling new movements that target various muscle groups simultaneously, improving balance and coordination.

Implementation Method 1

a friction-based rotation resistance mechanism that includes a compressive spring providing compression force on a brake material positioned between two housings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a friction-based rotation resistance mechanism that includes a compressive spring providing compression force on a brake material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS11896864B2Rotation resistant exercise device
Publication Date: 2024.02.13 POWERSPHERE PARTNERS LLC
  • US11896864B2 patent drawing
  • US11896864B2 patent drawing
  • US11896864B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An exercise device designed to strengthen the entire body, with particular focus on the upper body. The device facilitates the strengthening of the core, chest, back, shoulder, and arm muscles, and in particular muscles that move the core in the transverse plane. The device consists of two hemispherical shells, both of which have handles attached via risers. This allows the device to be gripped either by the spherical surfaces, by the handles, or a combination thereof. The hemispheres are attached to each other by means of a shaft with a variable braking mechanism. The braking mechanism can provide levels of rotational resistance from almost zero to virtually impossible to rotate, with the resistance level visibly indicated on the exterior of the device. The resistance level is changed by repeatedly rotating the two halves against each other in one direction or the other.